On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:30 AM, John R. Levine <johnl@iecc.com> wrote:
transition itself — a lose-lose proposition if ever there was one. And if,
to the contrary, the NTIA reads this language as compelling renewal of the contract and preventing the transition altogether, then this will send the wrong message to the rest of the world, many of whom doubt the bona fides of American stewardship of the network.
This is where he goes off the rails. The nativists behind this language couldn't care less what message it sends to the rest of the world.
R's, John
Agree, but doesn't negate the rest of it. j -- --------------------------------------------------------------- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -------------------------------------------------------------- -