Thank you Evan. We will keep the time constraints in mind, and submit comments prior to February 8th. Best, Ken ----- Original Message ----- From: Evan Leibovitch [mailto:evan@telly.org] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 01:24 PM To: Hansen, Kenneth Cc: NARALO Discussion List <na-discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] Opinions requested from the At-Large community on objection comments received on new gTLD applications. Hi Ken, On 31 January 2013 13:26, Hansen, Kenneth <Kenneth.Hansen@neustar.biz>wrote:
Thank you for the opportunity to provide additional detail. I greatly appreciate the effort to conduct thorough due diligence, "hearing objectively from all sides in a good-faith intent to investigate."
There are inaccuracies, as well as facts and important background information missing from the posting. Since the Application is the City of New York itself, I have reached out to them to discuss a response. Is there a deadline we should keep in mind?
You may not have time to defer. I am just now reminded that the Review Group needs to make its initial recommendations whether to escalate the received objections by Feb 8. Of course, even if the RG *does* make such a determination, the issue still has to be debated and ultimately brought to an ALAC vote. - Evan ------ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org ------