Alan Greenberg wrote:
If it is indeed a problem (and I am not making a case for or against), then we should be talking about changing the rules that are based on citizenship. In this particular case , would have preferred if the dialogue was carried out on the world-wide list so that those people involved could also have a say.
It is timely in a NARALO context because of our meeting tomorrow. The begining of our call will have Tricia Drakes of the Board Governance Committee as a participant, as the BGC is seeking input regarding the ALAC review. One of the two issues on which the BGC is most keen to hear input is the Westlake recommendation to address regional imbalance by adding two Asian NomComm members to ALAC (without any corresponding RALO-elected members). If the NomComm cannot be relied upon to pick, for ALAC reps designated for a region, people who are actually from that region, then isn't the Westlake recommendation pointless? - Evan PS: The other issue they want to hear about regards the recommendation to better clarify the distinction between NCUC and At-Large, from the point of view of participating stakeholders.