Even more questions: 1. When can we anticipate a decision being reached on the topic of board member compensation? 2. Board’s thoughts on APWG’s Accelerated Domain Suspension Process proposal seeking to define accreditation requirements for entities that would expedite takedowns of domains used in phishing or malware distribution? 3. Strategic Plan: “Clarify ICANN’s role in relation to consumer protection; develop a clear consensus position by the end of 2009.” What is the Board’s current view on ICANN’s role? 4. PSC Discussion Proposal: Establish accountability mechanisms that allow the community to remove the Board collectively and reconstitute it. When do you anticipate such a mechanism being in place? 5. ICANN sponsors regional registry/registrar gatherings. Will it ever sponsor regional gatherings exclusive to the non-contracted parties? 6. ICANN’s Emergency Names and Addressing Committee (ENAC) supposedly includes 1 appointed ALAC representative from each region. Whom has the ALAC appointed to serve on this Committee? 7. Will the ICANN Compliance Department be willing to tell us how many domains have been cancelled in the last year as a result of WDPRS filings? 8. Will ICANN issue a specification requiring Registrars to allow folk to add AAAA glue for their Domain Name Servers by a fixed date? 9. The Independent Review of the Board of ICANN recommended to “Move to fewer but longer board meetings”; does the board agree or disagree? 10. GNSO Councilor comment: “the RAA amendment consultative process essentially excluded registrants and users including brand owners, and ignored their input.” Is the Board aware of such Staff mismanagement?