I'm OK with 2/3 of the member ALSes voting for adoption/modification of the OP. I've added the paragraph you proposed, Bret. I'm also OK with Robert's change to parag. 3. Good idea to drop out those who don't participate. The threshold could be non-participation at 3 elections. Also added text for this in parag. 16. As for final approval of the OP, I propose we aim to have it at next week's ccall at the latest. We've been at this for months and months. Let's move on! JACOB: I was under the impression you were going to plan next week's ccall. _________________________________________ Luc Faubert Conseiller en gouvernance TI et en gestion du changement / IT governance and change management consulting +1 514 236 5129 www.LucFaubert.com www.isoc.qc.ca www.ccig.ca www.maillons.qc.ca
-----Original Message----- From: Bret Fausett [mailto:bfausett@internet.law.pro] Sent: 13 avril 2007 16:14 To: Thompson, Darlene Cc: Luc Faubert; na-discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] Action Items
Speaking of non-participation, I wonder whether we ought to consider a rule that would automatically drop an ALS from active/voting status for non-participation in __ successive elections?
Thompson, Darlene wrote:
I'm thinking that 75% might be a little high. Not sure, though. I'm just worried about lack of participation tieing our hands from doing ANYTHING.