Reject. The comments of those who bothered to comment were neither incorporated nor responded to. (Like you, I criticized the assertion that ALAC is the unique appropriate channel for individuals. --Wendy Brendler, Beau wrote:
http://forum.icann.org/lists/alac-mid-consult/pdfMMtE1XZm6d.pdf
I have noted some issues among the NA with some of the language in this report.
I would appreciate the guidance of the NARALO as to how to vote. Personally, I'm wavering between 60 percent for and 40 percent against. The percent I'm against mostly consists of wording that reads to me like something of a transferrence of power from the ALAC to the exec committee and the chair.
I'm also not sure about the language on page 4 referring to ALAC as the appropriate organizational channel for the voice and concern of the individual Internet user in ICANN processes. I'm opposed to this statement both in theory and in practice -- I don't think ALAC is doing that now, and I don't think it should be roped off as the most appropriate venue for individual users.
What sayest thou, constituents? Endorse or reject?