I think it is an interesting idea, too. And ICANN IS hoping the NARALO will show the way in coming up with something creative to better include individuals who want to be included. At 1:49 AM -0400 4/26/07, John L recently said:
For a bicameral RALO, what threshhold would you put on it for the "individual" side to become effective? I don't think it would work if we had only, say, 5, 10, or even 50 authenticated individuals. 100? 500? More?
I'd say at least as large as the smallest ALS.
I do like the idea of a bicameral RALO, and I'd like to take time to consider it, even if it means risking that we miss having a PR event in San Juan.
R's, John
_______________________________________________ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.ica... --- Draft MoU with ICANN: http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_MOU
Draft Operating Principles: http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_OP
Draft Code of Conduct: http://www.icannwiki.org/NARALO_Code_of_Conduct