April 25, 2008
4:37 p.m.
At 25/04/2008 11:44 AM, Evan Leibovitch wrote:
Alan Greenberg wrote:
Do remember that we are not talking about selecting a person to sit on the GNSO council. We are talking about how one populates a new User Constituency with the larger NonCom Stakeholders Group. That Constituency, by whatever arcane rules it defines, then select N members to sit on the GNSO Council.
Then we're back to the re-invention of ALAC that I'm trying to prevent. Maybe our positions are not as easy to reconcile as I thought.
ALAC *is* the representative body of the end-user constituency.
That was not my "position". I am only stating what the Board Governance Committee, in their wisdom, approved. It was not a solution that I supported. Alan