Great idea Brett. How is 10 AM PST next Tuesday for a conference call? Please respond to me only so we don't clog up people's inboxes. cheers, Jacob Jacob Malthouse ICANN jacob.malthouse@icann.org 310 430 3856 On 11-Apr-07, at 11:26 AM, bfausett@internet.law.pro wrote:
I agree with Evan. We should meet if we need to meet and save ourselves and ICANN the time and money if we don't need to meet. By a separate message, I'll tick through the issues we need to resolve. Whether we meet in person in May or not, why don't we schedule some teleconference time next week to run through the issues?
-- Bret
On 4/10/07 7:47 PM, "Evan Leibovitch" <evan@telly.org> wrote:
I'm all for a meeting and agree that something co-ordinated ought to be held before San Juan. What I'm unsure about is whether this is best done by conference call or in-person meeting. To me it depends on how much needs to be done, and how much prep is required. If doing the May meeting by phone makes it more likely that we can be subsidized to the annual meeting, that works best.
_______________________________________________ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge- lists.icann.org --- Draft MoU with ICANN: http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_MOU
Draft Operating Principles: http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_OP