It's my understanding that this undertaking is about the groupings of existing political entities (countries, territiories, etc) into regions. This has nothing to do with language, "national character" or the internal foundations of political entitles, else this WG's global list of issues would be far too complex (and well beyond ICANN's core competencies) to cope with. I don't know enough to comment about the status of Greenland, which has self-rule yet is still bound by the foreign and fiscal policies of Denmark. I would prefer to hear from a potential ALS within Greenland, to find out where *they* would prefer to be, rather than having outsiders dictate their preference. If NARALO wants to make a general statement on the regional assignment of territorial and partially-autonomous entities, that's quite appropriate if desired. (I personally have no strong opinion on this, though I would lean towards allowing potential ALSs the ability to choose their preferred regions at the time of application.) Having said that, IMO it would be inappropriate to make comment beyond that scope. - Evan