Brendler, Beau wrote:
I'm closer to supporting this than anything else I've seen yet.
Danny, Evan, what do you think (the document is a little difficult to read as it's very wide, I'm referring to Nick's revisions on the right).
It is a massive step in the right direction, specifically in suggesting that ALAC may still play a role in GNSO while drafters are aware of its flowchart-rewriting consequences. I hope that there are lessons learned going forward -- certainly mistakes were made to get us to this point -- but on the immediate issue of "what do we send regarding the GNSO improvements" I like Nick's draft. Please -- especially amongst those who took issue with the original "final" versions -- if anyone has suggestions to make please offer them now. - Evan