Thanks, I read the code of conduct. It is unlike any code of conduct I've seen, a little too ambiguous. Could someone decide something and put it all up for review before calling for a vote? Subject: Individual reps for GA I don't really understand this concept. I thought this was the purpose for creating the ALS/ALAC/et al. Within this concept are we not reverting to an at-large membership base? Why would someone want to be part of an ALS if they could just have a direct correspondence anyway by claiming to be part of this as an individual? Mahalo, Randy Glass A@L On 4/23/07, Luc Faubert <LFaubert@conceptum.ca> wrote:
You're right Randy, and I apologize for the many late changes, but better do them now than have to go through another vote to change the OP in a few weeks. From my perspective at least, the OP are now pretty much final. The last thing I see we need is the Code of Conduct, which I'll try to work on tomorrow. This will be a separate document.
I've received news from IP&T. They are looking at what's involved in participating, will consult internally and give us an answer soon. Sylvia Caras from People Who has registered the org on our Contacts page. We're only missing one voting delegate from CLUE and one from People Who.
*To all ALSes: please make sure your voting delegates are registered to the NA-Als list *( http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-als_atlarge-lists.icann.o...). I've looked at the list of subscribers and not all of the voting delegates are subscribed.
*To all unaffiliated users: this is your last chance to choose your voting delegates to our General Assembly before the vote on our Operating Principles. *If you don't choose any delegates, the vote will happen without you being counted. It's not a problem of course if you get to this later, but I find it curious that with all the fuss about individual users needing to have a voice in NARALO, we don't see more interest in the task of selecting your voting delegates.
_________________________________________ Luc Faubert Conseiller en gouvernance TI et en gestion du changement / IT governance and change management consulting +1 514 236 5129 www.LucFaubert.com <http://www.lucfaubert.com/> www.LucFaubert.com/blog <http://www.lucfaubert.com/blog> www.isoc.qc.ca www.ccig.ca www.maillons.qc.ca
------------------------------ *From:* RJGlass | America@Large [mailto:jipshida@gmail.com] *Sent:* 23 avril 2007 18:15 *To:* Luc Faubert *Cc:* na-discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org *Subject:* Re: [NA-Discuss] Changes to OP
Yes, could someone put all the stuff we need together in one shot that we need to look at and/or revise and/or vote on??
Thanks -Randy Glass A@L
On 4/23/07, Luc Faubert <LFaubert@conceptum.ca> wrote:
Hello all,
I've made changes and additions to our OP: - added criteria for individual reps to the GA, - added compliance to our Code of Conduct (still to be determined), - added wording to say we vote for our Secretariat, - made explicit that ALAC terms are for 2 years.
I hope this is all satisfactory.
We still need to define our Code of Conduct. If anybody wants to help, we should ideally do this before ratifying our OP this week, as the OP parag. 17 now says that participation to NARALO implies agreement to the Code of Conduct,
_________________________________________ Luc Faubert Conseiller en gouvernance TI et en gestion du changement / IT governance and change management consulting +1 514 236 5129 www.LucFaubert.com <http://www.lucfaubert.com/> www.LucFaubert.com/blog <http://www.lucfaubert.com/blog> www.isoc.qc.ca www.ccig.ca www.maillons.qc.ca
_______________________________________________ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.ica...
--- Draft MoU with ICANN: http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_MOU
Draft Operating Principles: http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_OP
-- ------------------------- AmericaAtLarge.org RJPacific.com DDMF.org
-- ------------------------- AmericaAtLarge.org RJPacific.com DDMF.org