Or, in other words, the NARALO effort was not worthy of any single ALAC vote in favour of it. From the outside view it seems as though as any such effort never existed. Sad but reality. Dominik -----Original Message----- From: na-discuss-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:na-discuss-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Dominik Filipp Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 10:16 AM To: Evan Leibovitch; Bret Fausett Cc: NA Discuss Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] ALAC Review Draft is published -----Original Message----- From: na-discuss-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:na-discuss-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Evan Leibovitch Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 12:36 AM To: Bret Fausett Cc: NA Discuss Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] ALAC Review Draft is published
There are voices here who say ALAC was too compromising on tasting even _with_ the pressure from NARALO to get rid of the AGP. Imagine what the position would have been had the voice of NARALO been
further diminished.
- Evan
I am afraid, the position would be almost the same. The final tasting proposal was almost completely taken from Jeff Neumans's .BIZ registry vision just decorated with some cosmetics. The ALAC in fact seconded it unanimously and did not append any remarkable input. Despite all the valuable effort coming from the NARALO community. Dominik ------ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists .icann.org Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org ------ ------ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists .icann.org Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org ------