Although it does raise the issue of how does one define "the full course" - a line has to be drawn somewhere, recognizing timeliness. I note Bertrand's comments while voting on .xxx - that voting yes was the best way to resolve the issue, as no would just put them back through the same cycle. j On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 1:11 PM, J.D. Falk <jdfalk-lists@cybernothing.org>wrote:
On Mar 18, 2011, at 6:40 AM, Joly MacFie wrote:
I like this one.
+1
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 7:55 AM, Danny Younger <dannyyounger@yahoo.com wrote:
Proposed comment:
With regard to GAC Scorecard point #6.1.1, the ALAC notes the divergent views expressed with regard to the issue of proof of trademark use and reminds the ICANN Board of the comment expressed by Lawrence E. Strickling, Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information at the U.S. Department of Commerce during ICANN’s Opening Ceremony:
“Choosing between competing interests, rather than insisting on consensus, is destructive of the multistakeholder process because it devalues this incentive for everyone to work together.”
The ALAC encourages the ICANN Board to (1) remind the community of the reciprocal obligation on all participants to work together to find solutions that most support and few who are actually impacted vigorously oppose; and (2) to stay a decision on this issue until such time as the consensus process has run its full course.
-- J.D. Falk Coalition Against Unsolicited Commercial Email http://www.cauce.org/ ------ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org ------
-- --------------------------------------------------------------- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -------------------------------------------------------------- -