I support this. No one (among us in any case) is likely to advocate WHOIS inaccuracy, but putting efforts on addressing or at least identifying the real targets is crucially important. As I get deeper into the Post Expiration Domain Name Recovery issue, it is becoming apparent that earlier attempts to address the problem not only did not fix the problem, but may have in fact worsened it. I attribute this to some degree because they were trying to fix a symptom and not address the long-term needs. Alan At 14/09/2009 02:10 PM, Gareth Shearman wrote:
I certainly agree with Danny, Garth and Evan that the Whois issue needs to be addressed, but I also agree with Ross that we need to address the larger policy issues as well.
Gareth
On 14-Sep-09, at 9:10 AM, Evan Leibovitch wrote:
Ross Rader wrote:
An exchange of two or three emails doesn't lead to "a really good idea of what needs to be done".
And At-Large has been at this for a very long time.
I believe that it has already identified WHOIS accuracy as a necessary -- if not complete -- part of the solution. Danny's original question was on tactics, not strategy.
If we stay in the theoretical forever we get nothing done -- which is what's been happening. Eventually we need to define specific fixes.
- Evan
------ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.ica...
Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org ------
------ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.ica...
Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org ------