Darlene, A domain name that consists of a single label is referred to as a "dotless domain name". Use of dotless names could provide potential innovations to the domain name industry and new gTLD applicants, but their use also raises usability, functionality, security and stability concerns as described in the SSAC 053 advisory. SSAC 053 advised against it. Further work is proceeding to document the security and stability implications of dotless domains. On the 28th of May ICANN announced that it has commissioned a study on the potential risks related to dotless domain names based on SAC 053 report. The study report will identify and describe the potential risks that dotless names raise with particular focus on those related to security and stability. The report will also provide options forICANN as to how to mitigate the various risks and will describe the pros and cons of the options. In both cases ICANN intends to deliver the study teams findings before the ICANN 47th meeting in Durban, South Africa. ref - http://www.icann.org/en/groups/ssac/documents/sac-053-en.pdf - http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-28may13-en.htm regards Robert -- R. Guerra Phone/Cell: +1 202-905-2081 Twitter: twitter.com/netfreedom Email: rguerra@privaterra.org On 2013-06-09, at 6:22 PM, Thompson, Darlene wrote:
To try to understand this issue: why were dotless domains ruled out of the new gTLD expansion? What is the problem with them?
Thanks,
D
Darlene A. Thompson CAP Administrator N-CAP/Department of Education P.O. Box 1000, Station 910 Iqaluit, NU X0A 0H0 Phone: (867) 975-5631 Fax: (867) 975-5610 dthompson@gov.nu.ca ________________________________________ From: na-discuss-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [na-discuss-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of Evan Leibovitch [evan@telly.org] Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2013 4:27 PM To: NARALO Discussion List; John R Levine Subject: [NA-Discuss] Dotless domains
In an attempt to getting NARALO back onto discussion of domain name issues that we are mandated to understand (hopefully enough to comment upon in the public interest), I would like to bring your attention to the issue of "dotless domains".
Ie, "http://domain" or "http://example"
Dotlesss domains were explicitly ruled out of the new gTLD expansion, according to 2.2.3.3 of the Applicant Guidebook. The SSAC has come out strongly against them, in this round or any others, in SSAC-053. Yet Google wants to designate .search as dotless<http://techcrunch.com/2013/04/10/google-wants-to-operate-search-as-a-dotless...>, having applied originally based on the premise that it would not be. Apparently, the issue is still being considered and has not been abruptly rejected as one might have thought.
I am still learning about the issue, though at first glance I am puzzled by any move that would seem to retroactively contravene the application rules. I further don't see any great benefit to the public interest that would offset the SSAC's concerns about stability. I would like to know what others know or think on the matter.
-- Evan Leibovitch Toronto Canada
Em: evan at telly dot org Sk: evanleibovitch Tw: el56 ------ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org ------
------ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org ------