If we are going to put the the ALS's under the microsope then we need to go further and look how active these members are as to working groups, voting patterns and active involvement. This should definitely be our yardstick for anyone looking to representing NARALO. Glenn Glenn McKnight mcknight.glenn@gmail.com skype gmcknight twitter gmcknight Http://www.globalcatalysts.com http://newsocialmedia.wordpress.com On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Avri Doria <avri@ella.com> wrote:
hi,
Interesting exercise. And a useful one if we ever start to have a discussion on ALS voting for Board seats.
Is there a chart of which ALS have been active etc..
I think it would be good to see a list that covered issues like:
- when accepted to by ralo - active/not active - notification of date informed of inactive status - votes participated in - number of members - representative name - alternate representative (if we have such a notion)
Or do we already have something like this and I just have not looked in the right place.
As for how each of the ALS organizes itself internally, and the means by which they make decisions regarding ALS stuff, I tend towards subsidiarity.
Except of course for the individuals-ALS, their processes for self organization and decision making should be discussed by the RALO generally, though I do think it should be their decision which the RALO vets.
avri ------ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org ------