Re: [NA-Discuss] For consideration at the monthly meeting

Alan, you may be right... or not. At the very least we could have our Chair ask the ICANN General Counsel for an opinion. --- On Sat, 9/27/08, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:

From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] For consideration at the monthly meeting To: "NA Discuss" <na-discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Date: Saturday, September 27, 2008, 1:17 PM I take issue with the statement that the NARALO could continue as an At-Large RALO and be a GNSO constituency. I am pretty sure that this would be over the line and not acceptable. It would (in my opinion) have to be an either-or thing).

Alan