On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Evan Leibovitch <evan@telly.org> wrote:
Good stuff. While so much of the ICANN world focuses on TLDs -- because there is so much loose money floating around that realm -- every now and then we need to be reminded of the other resources under ICANN's stewardship, and the fact that in those realms too there are actors who would diminish the public interest in the management of such resources.
Well said Evan, I agree that number policy seems to often take a backseat to names.
Thanks, Chris.
Thanks for reading! Hopefully the article does something to inform the discussions and at least cause folks to think a bit more deeply about the issues at play.
On 24 May 2013 11:26, Garth Bruen <gbruen@knujon.com> wrote:
"Removing Need at RIPE" http://www.circleid.com/posts/20130523_removing_need_at_ripe/
Interesting analysis of RIPE policies concerning IPv4 allocations.
Thanks for sharing Garth, I'm glad you found it interesting! Cheers, ~Chris
------ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org ------
-- Evan Leibovitch Toronto Canada
Em: evan at telly dot org Sk: evanleibovitch Tw: el56 ------ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org ------
-- @ChrisGrundemann http://chrisgrundemann.com