Evan and all, I totally don't agree that the term "Registrant" confuses either user or registrant, nor do any of our INEGroup members. Remember all registrants ARE also users. But I do agree with Evan that the ALAC should be primarly for users, but should not restrict input to only users that are not registrants as well. To have such a restriction is both unwise and sets up endless warring between the two. and such would server noone any good service. -----Original Message-----
From: Evan Leibovitch <evan@telly.org> Sent: Apr 13, 2008 12:41 PM To: "Brendler, Beau" <Brenbe@consumer.org> Cc: At-Large writ small <alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: Re: [At-Large] Comments on GNSO improvements
Brendler, Beau wrote:
Sounds like a realistic approach. I'd argue for just "user," as "registrant" is just another jargon term that confuses people.
I agree. While "registrant" is well understood in these circles, the need in GNSO is for users -- those who neither buy nor sell domains but have a stake in Internet usability -- to be represented.
- Evan Regards,
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 281k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com My Phone: 214-244-4827