Additional questions: 1. RAA amendment: ability to create new Registered Names suspended if Registrar is repeatedly/willfully in fundamental/material breach of its obligations at least three times within year. Why isn’t once sufficient? 2. RAA: In the event ICANN establishes a Code of Conduct for ICANN accredited registrars, Registrar shall abide by that Code; Will ICANN ever establish a registrar code of conduct? 3. RAA amendment: “Upon execution of agreement, Registrar shall provide ICANN with a list of the names of Registrar's directors and officers”. Will such a list ever be made public? 4. RAA: “Registrar shall abide by ICANN adopted specifications or policies prohibiting or restricting warehousing of or speculation in domain names by registrars.” Will such a policy be forthcoming? 5. RAA amendment: registrar shall display conspicuous notice when election is made to utilize proxy services that customer data is not being escrowed. Is Board comfortable with this loophole? 6. RAA amendment: “In the event that ICANN publishes a webpage that identifies available registrant rights and responsibilities”. When does ICANN intend to publish such a page? 7. One would think that an organization committed to transparency would publicly post the registrar accreditation applications. Will this ever happen? 8. ICANN Staff issued a Draft Statement of Work for Funnel Review (indicating a review is consistent with ICANN's efforts to improve policies/procedures). Can we also expect a UDRP review? 9. RIRs are considering proposals to permit market-based address transfers. Does the Board have a view on this development? 10. When will ICANN articulate a transparent mechanism, that includes community agreement, for the disposition of excess new gTLD revenues, should there be any, given ICANN’s non-profit status?