Evan, were there ever cases where there were more candidates than slots and consensus was used? Alan At 08/08/2013 04:34 AM, Evan Leibovitch wrote:
On 6 August 2013 10:15, Alan Greenberg <<mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote: At 06/08/2013 08:31 AM, Thompson, Darlene wrote:
#12 refers to ALAC members being chosen by a rough consensus process. This has never been done. It has always been done by a voting process. The rough consensus wording should rather be used for routine decisions.
I am happy to make such a change if there is such a will.
I wouldn't say never.
NARALO's first two non-ALAC reps -- Robert and Beau - were chosen by consensus, no vote was ever taken. I believe that Gareth's selection as well as my first, were also done that way.
I would prefer to keep the option so to allow for the flexibility.
- Evan