April 20, 2007
12:24 p.m.
RJGlass | America@Large wrote:
-Individuals should predominately represented -organizational membership within an ALS should be OK -this conversation is inflammatory -individual at-large membership should be either a) put into a subgroup or b) referred to an ALS
And I'm agreed with Randy on all points. I would also make explicit that in the case of orgs-within-orgs, the participating subgroups must themselves be membership bodies similar to the existing requirement of ALSs. I wouldn't want this to be used as a backdoor to allow in groups that otherwise would not qualify for acceptance. - Evan