For the record I'm thrilled I'm still considered active enough <grin> to vote. And Evan's proposed voting process sounds like what we have discussed before, haven't we? Thaks for the reminder. I remember in interim ALAC how we struggled with how to define "active"-- we had several members who never participated in anything, not the listserv, not the phone calls, and not the meetings. It held things up. But in Naralo, didn't we address this back in the bylaws discussions?? Re talking about it all right now--I think the expression "we have bigger fish to fry" could be appropriate here. We've got some momentum going on some bigger complaints against ICANN and imagine if we all stood together in that..... :-) we can always pick up the process parts later, but again, just my opinion, others may disagree. At 1:54 PM -0400 9/15/09, Thompson, Darlene recently said:
I have to agree with Evan here and I certainly don't want to waste a pile of time on our next conference call. This was discussed TO DEATH before NARALO came into existence. I would much rather put my energy into policy rather than process.
D
Darlene A. Thompson