Jacqueline: I was just about to respond to Danny's message when I saw that you had already. Agree that the issue is also of great interest outside NA . let me suggest the following: - that Danny's message be forwarded to the larger at-large list, as its more an international issue then one exclusively of interest to NA - if there's interest in ccNSO, then might it be of interest to invite CIRA - The Canadian Internet Registry Authority - to come to speak to at-large @ San Juan. I know for sure they will at the meeting, and likely - time & schedules permitting - they would open to meeting with at-large. As a Canadian, well, keen to share what's been developed here. If there's interest, do let Luc Faubert and I know as we can get in touch with CIRA and see what times they might be available to meet with At-large. regards, Robert --- Robert Guerra <rguerra@privaterra.ca> Managing Director, Privaterra Tel +1 416 893 0377 On 14-Jun-07, at 9:29 AM, Jacqueline A. Morris wrote:
Hi Danny This is a concern in other places, and ALAC has set up several meetings with ccNSO in San Juan to discuss how we can work together on issues such as this. I don't think that it belongs in the NARALO MoU, but rather is a global issue that ALL regions should work on together. Jacqueline
-----Original Message----- From: Danny Younger [mailto:dannyyounger@yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 9:11 AM To: NA Discuss Subject: [NA-Discuss] MOU - ICANN Obligations: Redelegation
I remain troubled by the total lack of transparency in the ccTLD redelegation process. Has anyone ever seen a detailed redelegation request posted for consideration prior to action being taken by the Board?
The .us situation is particularly bad. On the last go-around ICANN bypassed the normal IANA processes to declare an "emergency redelegation" -- see http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-19nov01.htm
I certainly don't want the relevant Internet community being kept in the dark should the delegation of the .us namespace become an issue.
I would ask that the NARALO MOU stipulate that ICANN has the obligation to inform the NARALO upon the receipt of any relevant ccTLD redelegation request (.us or .ca) so that community input may be provided (as per RFC 1591: "it is also appropriate for interested parties to have some voice in selecting the designated manager.")
______________________________________________________________________ ______ ________ Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545469
_______________________________________________ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge- lists.ica nn.org --- Draft MoU with ICANN: http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_MOU
Draft Operating Principles: http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_OP
Draft Code of Conduct: http://www.icannwiki.org/NARALO_Code_of_Conduct
No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.15/848 - Release Date: 6/13/2007 12:50 PM
No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.15/848 - Release Date: 6/13/2007 12:50 PM
_______________________________________________ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge- lists.icann.org --- Draft MoU with ICANN: http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_MOU
Draft Operating Principles: http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_OP
Draft Code of Conduct: http://www.icannwiki.org/NARALO_Code_of_Conduct