Without intending to justify either the absolute salaries or the 1-year increases, I did note that in at least one case, the 2006 number was for a partial year, so the actual annual increase was less the simple division of the two numbers. Alan At 22/09/2008 02:28 PM, Robert Guerra wrote:
Danny:
Thanks for posting details on ICANN's IRS (Tax) filing.
Just goes to prove that ICANN does have funding to pay for things. Seems, like in the banking sector they prefer instead to pay their executives vs the public they serve.
With congress seeking to limit executive compensation, perhaps same thing should happen to ICANN.
Robert
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Danny Younger <dannyyounger@yahoo.com> wrote:
[excerpt]
"This is an outrageous 74% increase year-over-year for total compensation for the top 5"
http://gordoncook.net/wp/?p=274
------ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.ica...
Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org ------
------ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.ica...
Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org ------