Jan. 18, 2007
9:23 p.m.
Add: If we do things by consensus -- and maybe that's what we do for Chair selection as well -- voting probably matters less. My suspicion is that there will be very little competition for the uncompensated, no-travel, no glory position of NARALO Chair anyway. If one responsible person comes forward, I expect everyone else will say, okay fine, thank you. On 1/18/07 1:05 PM, "Wendy Seltzer" <wendy@seltzer.com> wrote:
If so, do you have any ideas on how to weigh the votes of individuals against those of ALS's?
Perhaps numerically weighted, compared to the memberships of the ALSs, perhaps as a proportion of the total, perhaps as a "second house." I don't see this challenge as being much greater than the weighting of differently sized ALSs.