-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Brendler, Beau wrote:
This is an interesting idea...worth discussion I think.
If -- as the ALAC review recommends -- it is made more clear what distinguishes At-Large from NCUC, I don't see why we could not pursue this. At least it doesn't hurt to ask, and Danny makes a good point about a hole in the GNSO's representation. While it is possible that ALAC can't be in both, NARALO is one step removed from ALAC and, in both theory and practise from my POV, closer to the grassroots. For one thing, unlike ALAC, NARALO is not an exclusive club joinable only by election or appointment. Any org that meets certain guidelines -- or any individual with even fewer limitations -- can be involved. - - Evan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFI4Nt+B6WWYxnsgmwRAkqsAKCdPK6xzs2NPrkYXctjci9yrfhsiwCfRp3B 3L9OtJJKdulWLPsXxcXVvxo= =HeMs -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----