Hi Evan, That fully states my personal opinion, too. We just have to put something in, even if its "we don't care" or "we are fine with the status quo". Staff has nudged me and told me we have to put in SOMETHING. So, unless anybody would like to issue some kind of a statement for the region, our reply will be along the lines of "we are fine wtih the status quo". D Darlene A. Thompson CAP Administrator N-CAP/Department of Education P.O. Box 1000, Station 910 Iqaluit, NU X0A 0H0 Phone: (867) 975-5631 Fax: (867) 979-5610 dthompson@gov.nu.ca ________________________________________ From: na-discuss-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [na-discuss-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of Evan Leibovitch [evan@telly.org] Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 11:11 AM To: Thompson, Darlene Cc: na-discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] Geographic Regions Statement On 27 January 2011 10:49, Thompson, Darlene <DThompson1@gov.nu.ca> wrote:
Hi all,
I am just checking, here. The deadline for regional comments is tomorrow night on the Geographic Regions Statement. Here is the link to the comments made by other regions:
https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Interim+Report+of+Geographic+Reg...
Do we wish to submit a comment on this?
Don't think there's much for our three-country region to contribute. The only issues even of marginal interest (about which I've seen no discussion) are: - Whether some parts of the Caribbean identify more with North America than South America - The status of protectorates that "belong" to one country but are located in a different region (ie, do we 'trade' Guam for St. Pierre?) In all, I may have some opinions, but nothing strong enough to constitute the basic for a regional statement. This issue means a great deal more to other regions. - Evan ------ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org ------