NA RALO - Rules of Procedure
Below & attached are the NA-RALO rules of procedure that were adopted unanimously . regards, Robert --- Robert Guerra <rguerra@privaterra.ca> Managing Director, Privaterra Tel +1 416 893 0377 ORDINARY RULES OF PROCEDURE DEFINITIONS The following terms when used in these Rules of Procedure shall have the meanings here indicated: “General Assembly” or “Assembly” means any meeting or conference, or standing constituent body of the At-Large Community, as well as actual General Assembly sessions of a Regional At-Large Organisation; “At-Large Structure” or “ALS” means any organisation that has applied for, and been granted, such status by the then-current process and according to the then-current requirements as decided by and defined by ICANN. “Virtual Meeting” shall mean a meeting in which all participants are unable to participate synchronously with all other participants, such as a meeting conducted over time via an electronic mailing list. In a Virtual Meeting, any reference in the Rules to ‘speaking’ or to ‘speak’ shall mean ‘communicate’ and vice-versa. I. PARTICIPATION AND ACCREDITATION Rule 1 - Chief Participants 1.1 The two (2) representatives of each accredited At Large Structure on or before the opening of a session of the Assembly may participate in the work of the Assembly. 1.2 The representatives of At Large Structures that have applied for accreditation to ALAC but not yet accredited may participate in the work of the Assembly as observers subject to Rule 7.3. 1.3 Individuals representing themselves or other organizations who have participated in the work of the Assembly through a connection with an ALS previously may participate in the work of the Assembly as observers subject to Rule 7.3. 1.4 The right to vote in the General Assembly is reserved for the representatives of accredited ALSes per Rule 1.1 which have indicated their consent to be bound by the terms of the Memorandum of Understanding with ICANN, as may be amended from time to time, and the Operating Principles or other constitutive instruments of the Region, in the form and manner determined by the Secretariat of the Regional At-Large Organisation. II. ORGANIZATION OF THE ASSEMBLY Rule 2 - Election of Officers 2.1 The Assembly shall elect a Chairperson, at least two (2) Vice- Chairpersons and a Rapporteur by simple majority of accredited ALS present and voting. These offices shall be automatically vacated upon the adjournment of each General Assembly, unless the Assembly shall decide otherwise. The Chair and Vice-Chair of a meeting may be re-elected to serve in those positions by a later Assembly. Rule 3 - Qualification Criteria for Officers All officers must be official representatives of accredited At Large Structures. III. CONDUCT OF BUSINESS Rule 4 - Duties of the Chairperson 4.1 The Chairperson shall open and close each plenary meeting of the Assembly. He/She shall direct the discussions, ensure observance of these Rules, accord the right to speak, put questions to the vote and announce decisions. He/She shall rule on points of order and, subject to the present Rules, shall control the proceedings and the maintenance of order. He/She shall not vote, but he/she may instruct another member of his/her delegation to vote on behalf of the organisation of which he/she is a representative. 4.2 Should the Chairperson be absent during a meeting, or any part thereof, he/she shall be replaced by the Vice-Chairperson. A Vice- Chairperson acting as Chairperson shall have the same powers and duties as the Chairperson. Rule 5 - Public Meetings 5.1 Meetings shall be held in public unless decided otherwise by the Assembly. Rule 6 - Quorum 6.1 A quorum shall consist of a simple majority of the accredited and active ALS referred to in Rule 1.1 present and represented at the Assembly. 6.2 The Assembly shall not decide on any matter unless a quorum is present. Rule 7 - Order and Time Limit of Speakers 7.1 The Chairperson shall call upon speakers in the order in which they signify their wish to speak. 7.2 For the convenience of the discussion, the Chair may limit the time to be allowed to each speaker. The chair may also, for the same purpose, limit the number of speakers on a question. 7.3 The consent of the Chair must be obtained whenever an observer wishes to address the Assembly. Rule 8 - Points of Order 8.1 During a discussion, any delegate may raise a point of order; such a point of order shall be immediately decided upon by the presiding officer. 8.2 An appeal may be made against the ruling of the presiding officer. Such an appeal shall be put to the vote immediately and the presiding officer's ruling shall stand, unless overruled by a majority of the delegations present and voting. Rule 9 - Procedural Motions 9.1 During a discussion, any delegate may move the suspension or adjournment of the meeting or the adjournment or closure of the debate. 9.2 Such a motion shall be put to the vote immediately. Subject to Rule 8.1, such motions shall have precedence in the following order over all other proposals or motions before the meeting: (a) Suspension of the meeting; (b) Adjournment of the meeting; (c) Adjournment of the debate on the question under discussion; (d) Closure of the debate on the question under discussion. Rule 10 - Working Languages 10.1 The working languages of the Assembly shall be as decided by the Assembly from time to time. 10.2 Speeches made at the Assembly in one of the working languages shall be simultaneously interpreted into the other working languages, subject to the availability of interpreters and funding for the interpretation service. Rule 11 - Resolutions and Amendments 11.1 Draft resolutions and amendments may be proposed by the participants referred to in Rule 1 and shall be transmitted in writing to the Secretariat of the Assembly, which shall circulate copies to all participants. 11.2 As a general rule, no draft resolution or amendment shall be discussed or put to the vote unless it has been circulated sufficiently in advance to all participants in the working languages of the Assembly. (Added clause below 20/11.2 so as to apply as well to virtual meetings) Rule 12 - Voting 12.1 Each accredited active At Large Structure referred to in Rule 1, subject to Rule 1.4, shall have one vote in the Assembly, save always that observers shall not have the right to vote. 12.2 Subject to the provisions of Rules 6.2 and 16, decisions shall be taken by a majority of the At Large Structures present and voting; for the purpose of the present Rules, the expression "At Large Structures present and voting" shall mean At Large Structures casting an affirmative or negative vote. At Large Structures abstaining from voting shall be regarded as having not voted. 12.3 Voting shall normally be by a show of hands. Electronic voting shall also be permitted where the Chair indicates that this manner of voting shall be used. 12.4 When the result of a vote by show of hands is in doubt, the presiding officer may take a second vote by a roll-call. A vote by roll-call shall also be taken if it is requested by not less than two delegations before the voting takes place. 12.5 When an amendment to a proposal is moved, the amendment shall be voted on first. When two or more amendments to a proposal are moved, the Assembly shall first vote on the amendment deemed by the presiding officer to be furthest removed in substance from the original proposal, and then on the amendment next furthest removed therefrom and so on, until all the amendments have been put to the vote. 12.6 If one or more amendments are adopted, the amended proposal shall then be voted upon as a whole. 12.7 A motion is considered an amendment to a proposal if it merely adds to, deletes from or revises part of that proposal. 12.8 The Assembly shall endeavour, when discussing any non-procedural question, to decide issues before it by general agreement. Voting shall be relied upon only to the extent that is necessary in cases where general agreement cannot be reached. Where a vote on a non- procedural question shall be required, the measure shall be carried if it receives a two-thirds vote of those ALSes present and voting. 12.9 The number of votes cast for or against any motion shall be limited by the following calculation with respect to any Assembly that is international in nature: a) The number of countries or territories covered by the entire membership of the Assembly shall form the numerator. b) The denominator shall be 100. c) The result of the division of (a)/(b) shall be multiplied by 100. d) The result of 12.9(c) shall be known as the Maximum Percentage. e) The votes cast by delegates representing ALSes normally domiciled in any one country may not in the aggregate exceed the Maximum Percentage. This calculation shall be separately applied to votes for and against any motion. Suspend 12.9 to be revisited by or at the Los Angeles (Fall 2007) ICANN meeting. Rule 13 - Procedures for the Presentation of Candidatures 13.1 The Secretariat shall ask all accredited ALS whether they intend to stand for election in the General Assembly at least two months prior to the opening of the General Assembly. Candidature must be declared and filed with the Secretariat at least four weeks prior to the opening of the General Assembly. 13.2 At least four weeks prior to the opening of the General Assembly the Secretariat shall send to all accredited representatives the list of ALS and their candidates. This list of candidatures may be revised as necessary, subject to other qualification rules that may be adopted by the General Assembly. 13.3 This list of candidatures shall be finalized and closed at least 48 hours before the opening of the General Assembly. IV. SECRETARIAT OF THE MEETING Rule 15 - Secretariat 15.1 The Secretariat shall be elected on an annual basis by the General Assembly. He/She shall not vote, but he/she may instruct another member of his/her delegation to vote on his/her behalf. He/ She may, at any time, make either oral or written statements to the Assembly on any question under discussion. 15.3 The Secretariat shall receive, translate and distribute all official documents and shall arrange for the interpretation of the discussions, as provided in Rule 10. It shall also perform all other duties necessary for the proper conduct of the work of the Assembly. 15.4 The Secretariat shall act as Chair of the meeting in order to conduct elections for the Chair and Vice-Chair, and shall cease to be Chair upon the election of the referenced officers. 15.5 Where there is a fee for membership of the organization of which the Assembly is the decision-making body, the Secretariat will provide information on the status of all compulsory and voluntary contributions to all requestors, as applicable, prior to the opening of the Assembly. V. ADOPTION AND AMENDMENT OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE Rule 16 - Adoption The General Assembly shall adopt its Rules of Procedure by a decision taken in plenary meeting by a simple majority of the representatives of ALS present and voting. Rule 17 - Amendment The Assembly may amend these Rules of Procedure by a decision taken in plenary meeting by a two-thirds majority of the representatives of ALS present and voting. VI. ADDITIONAL RULES OF PROCEDURE Rule 18 – Invocation of the UN General Assembly Rules of Procedure 18.1 Any delegate may, on a point of order, invoke any rule or rules of the then-current United Nations General Assembly Rules of Procedure where certain of those Rules would, in their view, facilitate the work of the Assembly. Subject to Rule 18.6, any UNGA Rule may be invoked. 18.2 The Chair of the Assembly may likewise invoke any rule or rules from the same source for the same reasons. 18.3 When Rule 18.1 or 18.2 is invoked, the Chair may terminate the operation of the rules so invoked at a time of his or her choosing, or, if he believes that the invocation is not in the interests of the Assembly, may refuse to allow the invocation. 18.4 Where the UNGA Rules of Procedure are invoked through the provisions of Rule 18.1 or 18.2, should a conflict arise between the rule or rules invoked and these rules, these Rules shall take precedence, except where the combination of these Rules and those invoked would result in an impractical or unworkable process in the judgment of the Chair. 18.5 The following terms in the UNGA Rules of Procedure shall have the following meanings when invoked under this Rule: “President” shall mean “Chair” Vice-President” shall mean “Vice-Chair” “Member” “Members”, or “Members of the United Nations” shall mean that class of delegate referred to in Rule 1.2 of these Rules “Secretary-General” shall indicate the senior person responsible for the operations of the Secretariat. “United Nations” shall mean “Regional At-Large Organisation” or the relevant other process or body of the At-Large community, including the entire community where that would be the logical intent in the context of the rule, which is availing itself of these Rules of Procedure. “Important Questions” shall mean “matters of substance” “Security Council” shall mean “At-Large Advisory Committee” 18.6 The following UNGA Rules may not be invoked under either Rule 18.1 or 18.2. Where a range of rules is indicated, that range shall be inclusive of the indicated beginning and ending Rules: Rules 4, 49, 51, 52, 55, 98(a), 98(b), 134 – 138, 142 – 151 VII. MODIFICATIONS TO THE RULES WHERE A VIRTUAL MEETING IS HELD 19 When a Virtual Meeting of the Assembly is held, the following Rules shall not apply: 6, 12.3 20 When a Virtual Meeting of the Assembly is held, the following Rules shall replace the original: 6.1 A quorum shall consist of a simple majority of all active and accredited ALS’s. 7 The Chair shall communicate the beginning and the ending of the debate upon a given topic. Members shall be out of order if they continue to communicate to the meeting on a question after the Chair has communicated the ending of debate and out of order communications shall not form a part of the record of the Assembly. 11.2 As a general rule, no draft resolution or amendment shall be discussed or put to the vote unless it has been circulated sufficiently in advance, but in no case less than two weeks, to all participants in the working languages of the Assembly. Should a vote in a virtual meeting not be quorate, then the chair shall extend the close of the vote for an equal amount of time as the original voting period. By the end of this extension, no quorum will be required. 12.4 All Voting shall be conducted electronically. The Chair shall declare the length of time not less than 14 days during which votes shall be cast, and the date and time of the closing of the vote. The Secretariat shall ensure that the results of the vote, including the votes cast and by which voter, are available to all representatives.
I apologize for not being present, but what is the origin of these new rules? I'm frankly surprised -- no, actually 'stunned' is a better word -- to see something so fully formed pop up as a complete document never before circulated on the list. I also note that some provisions of these "ordinary rules" are at odds with the previous rules of procedure that we adopted just last month. For example, the OP require us to work by consensus processes and these new rules ask us to work by motions and voting and implement a level of complexity that we had previously shunned. Finally, we can certainly amend the previous rules, but amendments to them need to be made by 70% of the accredited ALSs (see Para. 15). I don't believe you have 70% in the room in San Juan. As someone not in the room in San Juan, I'd really like to hear how we arrived at these new procedures and how the person(s) who presented them believe they relate to the already adopted OP. Many thanks. It sounds like great progress is being made on other fronts. Bret
Robert, May we impose upon you to know which individuals agreed to disrespect the basic concept of Notice and Comment by unanimously approving a document that had never previously been circulated on the list? It's important to know which of our peers have exercised such poor judgement. Certainly we wouldn't want any of them representing us or assuming any positions of authority... regards, Danny ____________________________________________________________________________________ Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative vehicles. Visit the Yahoo! Auto Green Center. http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/
After the meeting Luc, Darlene and Nick hung around to provide some background for me by teleconference. I now understand that these are more like "rules of order." Thank you all for the explanation. It helped quite a bit. I suppose we can hold any discussion of conflicts until such a conflict actually arises. Best to you all, Bret
Bret Fausett wrote:
After the meeting Luc, Darlene and Nick hung around Actually, there were about 10 people in the room to hear (and talk to) you, including Robert and Beau who had just been elected as NARALO reps to ALAC,
to provide some background for me by teleconference. I now understand that these are more like "rules of order." Thank you all for the explanation. It helped quite a bit. I suppose we can hold any discussion of conflicts until such a conflict actually arises. Best to you all. Thanks, Bret.
I even asked in the meeting what the relation of these processes were to "Roberts Rules of Order", which I've used on numerous occasions to help run meetings. The answer was that the ops that we had approved were heavily derived from RRoO, and upon going through it I would concur. - Evan
Hello all, This is the list of ALS delegates who participated to yesterday's meeting. You'll notice that they represent 2/3 of the ALSs in our region. Our interim Chair also attended parts of the meeting remotely. No other remote participants dialed in. Seth Michael Reiss IP&T USA Randolph Jefferson Glass America@Large USA Gareth Rui Shearman Telecommunities Canada Canada Darlene A Thompson N-CAP Canada Michael J Maranda AFCN USA Dharma E Bilotta Dailey EFN USA Luc Faubert ISOC Quebec Canada Evan Jeffrey Leibovitch CLUE Canada Robert Guerra Privaterra Canada Beau Brendler Consumer Reports WebWatch USA Eduardo Diaz ISOC Puerto Rico USA ISOC Puerto Rico also had 2 other delegates at the meeting. For those of you with questions on the procedures leading to the meeting, I will recall that Nick had posted a link to yesterday's agenda and documents (https://st.icann.org/naralo/index.cgi?24_june_2007) on this list as early as June 5th. We will be posting the final version of the documents adopted yesterday on our wiki shortly. Thanks to all who have worked so hard in the last months and all day yesterday to enable NARALO to move ahead, _________________________________________ Luc Faubert Conseiller en gouvernance TI et en gestion du changement / IT governance and change management consulting +1 514 236 5129 www.LucFaubert.com www.LucFaubert.com/blog www.isoc.qc.ca www.ccig.ca www.uqbm.qc.ca www.maillons.qc.ca
Congratulations to the NARALO on a lot of very good work done. Paul Twomey just referred to the NARALO in particular in his President's report. Additionally, having got the formation and structure done, it's important now that the RALOs move full speed ahead on policy issues - the NARALO seems ready to take this on with similar speed and success. Congratulations again. With regard to policy issues: For those in San Juan or attending remotely, the time for the Workshop on Protection of Registrants has been changed - it will now begin at 12:00 in the San Geronimo room (same as the Public Forum) - see http://sanjuan2007.icann.org/node/24 Jacqueline -----Original Message----- From: Luc Faubert [mailto:LFaubert@conceptum.ca] Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 10:16 AM To: NA Discuss Subject: [NA-Discuss] San Juan Sunday meeting Hello all, This is the list of ALS delegates who participated to yesterday's meeting. You'll notice that they represent 2/3 of the ALSs in our region. Our interim Chair also attended parts of the meeting remotely. No other remote participants dialed in. Seth Michael Reiss IP&T USA Randolph Jefferson Glass America@Large USA Gareth Rui Shearman Telecommunities Canada Canada Darlene A Thompson N-CAP Canada Michael J Maranda AFCN USA Dharma E Bilotta Dailey EFN USA Luc Faubert ISOC Quebec Canada Evan Jeffrey Leibovitch CLUE Canada Robert Guerra Privaterra Canada Beau Brendler Consumer Reports WebWatch USA Eduardo Diaz ISOC Puerto Rico USA ISOC Puerto Rico also had 2 other delegates at the meeting. For those of you with questions on the procedures leading to the meeting, I will recall that Nick had posted a link to yesterday's agenda and documents (https://st.icann.org/naralo/index.cgi?24_june_2007) on this list as early as June 5th. We will be posting the final version of the documents adopted yesterday on our wiki shortly. Thanks to all who have worked so hard in the last months and all day yesterday to enable NARALO to move ahead, _________________________________________ Luc Faubert Conseiller en gouvernance TI et en gestion du changement / IT governance and change management consulting +1 514 236 5129 www.LucFaubert.com www.LucFaubert.com/blog www.isoc.qc.ca www.ccig.ca www.uqbm.qc.ca www.maillons.qc.ca _______________________________________________ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.ica nn.org --- Draft MoU with ICANN: http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_MOU Draft Operating Principles: http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_OP Draft Code of Conduct: http://www.icannwiki.org/NARALO_Code_of_Conduct No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.9.6/865 - Release Date: 6/24/2007 8:33 AM No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.9.6/865 - Release Date: 6/24/2007 8:33 AM
If someone has a chance at the public forum, a registrant in .AERO (me) would like to know the status of the domain. The sponsorship agreement expired in 2006, so at this point it's operating without any contractual authority. Of the three sTLDs that came up for renewal last year, .MUSEUM got a six month time extension in March, and .COOP is supposed to be reapproved this week, but there's been no action on .AERO since June of 2006, a year ago, when the staff was supposed to negotiate a new agreement. What's the status of my .AERO domain? Since it comes up for renewal on Thursday, this is a question of some urgency to me. Tnx. Regards, John Levine, johnl@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://www.johnlevine.com, ex-Mayor "More Wiener schnitzel, please", said Tom, revealingly.
John L wrote:
If someone has a chance at the public forum, a registrant in .AERO (me) would like to know the status of the domain. The sponsorship agreement expired in 2006, so at this point it's operating without any contractual authority.
Crap. I got your mail just after the session closed, and I would have been happy to ask. I was surprised how few questions there were. If the opportunity arises again, I'll be happy to ask. - Evan
Hi John I'm checking with Kieren as to who we can direct this to immediately for a response. The email came a few mins after the session closed. Jacqueline -----Original Message----- From: John L [mailto:johnl@iecc.com] Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 11:41 AM To: Jacqueline A. Morris Cc: 'NA Discuss' Subject: [NA-Discuss] Question for the San Juan public forum If someone has a chance at the public forum, a registrant in .AERO (me) would like to know the status of the domain. The sponsorship agreement expired in 2006, so at this point it's operating without any contractual authority. Of the three sTLDs that came up for renewal last year, .MUSEUM got a six month time extension in March, and .COOP is supposed to be reapproved this week, but there's been no action on .AERO since June of 2006, a year ago, when the staff was supposed to negotiate a new agreement. What's the status of my .AERO domain? Since it comes up for renewal on Thursday, this is a question of some urgency to me. Tnx. Regards, John Levine, johnl@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://www.johnlevine.com, ex-Mayor "More Wiener schnitzel, please", said Tom, revealingly. No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.9.6/865 - Release Date: 6/24/2007 8:33 AM No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.9.6/865 - Release Date: 6/24/2007 8:33 AM
Did anyone ever have a chance to ask this question? During the meeting, I saw on the ICANN web site that Ed Hasbrouck goaded the ICANN staff into revealing two hitherto secret amendments giving six-month extensions of the existing .aero agreement, signed on behalf of ICANN by Kurt Pritz. There is nothing the board minutes related to .aero since a 2006 motion that directs the staff to negotiate a new agreement. I believe that all previous registry agreements and amendments have been subject to board vote, so I wish I had a chance to ask how come staff now gets to amend this agreement without telling anyone including, apparently, the board. Regards, John Levine, johnl@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://www.johnlevine.com, ex-Mayor "More Wiener schnitzel, please", said Tom, revealingly.
If someone has a chance at the public forum, a registrant in .AERO (me) would like to know the status of the domain. The sponsorship agreement expired in 2006, so at this point it's operating without any contractual authority.
Of the three sTLDs that came up for renewal last year, .MUSEUM got a six month time extension in March, and .COOP is supposed to be reapproved this week, but there's been no action on .AERO since June of 2006, a year ago, when the staff was supposed to negotiate a new agreement.
I asked in the public forum, "What are the rights of registrants if a registry goes belly up?"- A much more generic form of your question- certainly didn't know all the details that you just mentioned. The answer that I got was very generic as well-- I would summarize about 10 minutes of several panelists talking as "We're working on it." -Dharma Dailey. On Jun 30, 2007, at 12:31 PM, John L wrote:
Did anyone ever have a chance to ask this question?
During the meeting, I saw on the ICANN web site that Ed Hasbrouck goaded the ICANN staff into revealing two hitherto secret amendments giving six-month extensions of the existing .aero agreement, signed on behalf of ICANN by Kurt Pritz.
There is nothing the board minutes related to .aero since a 2006 motion that directs the staff to negotiate a new agreement. I believe that all previous registry agreements and amendments have been subject to board vote, so I wish I had a chance to ask how come staff now gets to amend this agreement without telling anyone including, apparently, the board.
Regards, John Levine, johnl@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://www.johnlevine.com, ex- Mayor "More Wiener schnitzel, please", said Tom, revealingly.
If someone has a chance at the public forum, a registrant in .AERO (me) would like to know the status of the domain. The sponsorship agreement expired in 2006, so at this point it's operating without any contractual authority.
Of the three sTLDs that came up for renewal last year, .MUSEUM got a six month time extension in March, and .COOP is supposed to be reapproved this week, but there's been no action on .AERO since June of 2006, a year ago, when the staff was supposed to negotiate a new agreement.
_______________________________________________ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge- lists.icann.org --- Draft MoU with ICANN: http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_MOU
Draft Operating Principles: http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_OP
Draft Code of Conduct: http://www.icannwiki.org/NARALO_Code_of_Conduct
participants (8)
-
Bret Fausett -
Danny Younger -
Dharma Dailey -
Evan Leibovitch -
Jacqueline A. Morris -
John L -
Luc Faubert -
Robert Guerra