Thanks all for the mail conversations, it adds to my learning experience. Lesson from this thread: font-specific approach does not yield much results. Keep writing best wishes Ganga --- Babul Films Society NGO np [regd] S-4, Saregama Apts, Shaikpetnala, GOLCONDA Post, HYDERABAD, Telangana State, INDIA ICT 4 Ecoawareness +91 9618082288 On 30.07.2017 18:44, Dr. AJAY D A T A wrote:
Dear Akshat,
Looking forward for the draft of Devanagari LGR. Lets share with everyone for comments.
Thanks
DR. AJAY DATA | FOUNDER & CEO Get email id like अजय@डाटा.भारत in your own language, visit www.xgenplus.com [1]
------------------------- FROM: Akshat Joshi <akshatj@cdac.in> MailId : [71630017] TO: Bal Krishna Bal <bkbal@ltk.org.np> CC: neo brahmi <NeobrahmiGP@icann.org> SUBJECT: Re: [Neobrahmigp] Query on confusable composite characters DATE: 28 Jul 2017 02:16:38 PM
Hello Dr Bal,
Thanks for the question. It is indeed important to get this clarified.
When we are doing the analysis, we cannot and should not limit ourselves to any specific font. At the same time this is also true that we cannot take into account all the possible fonts.
We cannot and should not limit because across the Operating Systems there are various fonts present. Even within the same operating system, across its versions, different fonts can be used. Even if we talk about a particular OS and a particular version, among different browsers different fonts could be used to show the address bar content. If we further fix a particular browser, browsers are not the only place where URLs are used. They can be a part of an email where all the possible fonts can be used. In essence, font specific analysis cannot yield great results.
Having said the above, analyzing all the fonts is impossible too.
It actually means that there is no fixed way to take this up. In my opinion, we should go by the common glyph shaping behavior within the respective scripts and chart our road ahead. Even across various fonts, styles there is always a common denominator which we can consider. That is what we are doing.
Thanks for asking this question. It brings this aspect of our approach, out.
Regards,
Akshat Joshi
On 24-07-2017 06:43, Bal Krishna Bal wrote:
Hello Akshat and the NBGP members, In our recent discussions on confusable composite characters, we have noticed that the confusion is only prominent across certain fonts and not with all universally. I have attached a few samples where the strings and the respective fonts are highlighted in yellow. The question is - are we considering font specific issues here? Are there any fonts being considered to be used as default ones to display Devanagari text on the browser`s address bar? Regards, Bal Krishna
-- Regards, Akshat Joshi C-DAC GIST
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ C-DAC is on Social-Media too. Kindly follow us at: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CDACINDIA & Twitter: @cdacindia ]
This e-mail is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies and the original message. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this email is strictly prohibited and appropriate legal action will be taken. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------_______________________________________________ Neobrahmigp mailing list Neobrahmigp@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/neobrahmigp
Do not Remove: [HID]20170728141636273[-HID]
Links: ------ [1] http://www.xgenplus.com/ _______________________________________________ Neobrahmigp mailing list Neobrahmigp@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/neobrahmigp