Thanks for your thorough and quick answer, Martin! See yous in a couple of days, I'm in Copenhagen already. -Raoul On 8 March 2017 at 14:09, Martin Pablo Silva Valent <mpsilvavalent@gmail.com
wrote:
Joan has an updated database.
The difference is the stake, is that NPOC cares about how NGOs use, or could use, the DNS for their operations, regardless of their specific mission. NCUC cares for the right of the end user, we care for how the organisations of civil society use the DNS to operate, organize, get funds, get memebrs, manage projects, etc.
Of course you could also debate this an nscg, technically even as an ncuc, but reality has shown that this operational concerns were not being addressed at all, and that left out a relevant distinct interest of a stakeholder, therefore NPOC was summoned. And constituencies in ncsg by design tent to be more like glorified working groups than actually constituencies, is about subject that groups want to permanently address (my free interpretation of the charter that allows to create and delete constituencies inside ncsg)
Don't stop asking never!
Cheers, Martin
On 8 Mar 2017 08:00, "Raoul Plommer" <plommer@gmail.com> wrote:
http://www.npoc.org/members.html This page is offline? The ICANN wiki shows data from 2013..
How many members do we have?
Again, I'm trying to distinguish between NPOC and NCUC. What is the biggest difference between them, apart from the fact that NPOC only allows organisations to join?
-Raoul
_______________________________________________ Npoc-discuss mailing list Npoc-discuss@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/npoc-discuss