Good practices could be defined as the things groups have implemented and have brought good results along the time - some examples for Nomcom : Note all suggestions that have been suggested during the NC work to guarantee it will be part of the recommendations to the next NomCom Have a recommendation committee itself is also a good practice Vanda Scartezini Sent from my iPhone Sorry for typos On 9 Feb 2025, at 08:24, Hadia Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi via Phr <phr@icann.org> wrote: Hi Chris and All, My understanding that this means: Reviewing the CIP against established good practices, like benchmarking improvement efforts against relevant recognized good efforts. If so, I suppose each SO/AC/NomCom needs to identify those good practices. Best wishes Hadia Elminiawi From: Chris Disspain via Phr <phr@icann.org> Sent: 08 February 2025 13:53 To: phr@icann.org Cc: Jessica Puccio <jessica.puccio@icann.org> Subject: [External] [Phr] Re: Update on Monday's Plenary Call & Next Steps Hello All, 1. How should best good practices be defined? (Pg 22 & 72 of ATRT3 Final Report<https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/atrt3-report-29may20-en.pdf>). 2. Should best good practices be understood/agreed upon by the SO/AC/NomCom before each group undertakes its work? I have a question… The ATRT 3 Final Report says - 'Review continuous improvement efforts of SO/AC/NC based on good practices’. Does this mean that the review should consider whether the CIP efforts of an SO are based on good practices or does it mean that the review should be based on good practices? Obviously good practice for doing a review is a different set of practices from those for continuous improvement efforts. Thoughts? Cheers, Chris Disspain chris@disspain.uk<mailto:chris@disspain.uk> +44 7880 642456 <image001.png> On 29 Jan 2025, at 17:26, Jessica Puccio via Phr <phr@icann.org<mailto:phr@icann.org>> wrote: Hello Team - We are currently working to coordinate a meeting with the Board’s Organizational Effectiveness Committee (OEC) in response to León’s request. Since it is unlikely that the meeting with the OEC will occur prior to the team’s next scheduled plenary call, the Monday, 03 February PHR call will be canceled. In lieu of the plenary call, we would like to encourage continued discussion on the survey from the last call, via the mailing list, on the issue of defining “good practices”. There was agreement in the survey that “[r]eviewing continuous improvement efforts of SO/AC/NC based on good practices”, is within our remit. With this in mind, we would like to ask: 1. How should best practices be defined? (Pg 22 & 72 of ATRT3 Final Report<https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/atrt3-report-29may20-en.pdf>). 2. Should best practices be understood/agreed upon by the SO/AC/NomCom before each group undertakes its work? We look forward to hearing your thoughts and perspective on this issue. Best Regards Co-Chairs Chris & Sophie -- Jessica Puccio Sr Coordinator, Review Support and Accountability Projects Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN<http://www.icann.org/>) _______________________________________________ Phr mailing list -- phr@icann.org<mailto:phr@icann.org> To unsubscribe send an email to phr-leave@icann.org<mailto:phr-leave@icann.org> _______________________________________________ Phr mailing list -- phr@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to phr-leave@icann.org
