Totally agree Seb. For instance one of those good practices fro NOMCOM looks like not useful for other grousp. I explain: Recommendations committee NOMCOM, year after year, improves its process based on a Recommendation written by the current year delegates to help next year delegates to continuously evolve the process. This works for NOMCOM due to the constant change of delegates members and leadership team. Such by-year changes do not occur in another AC/SO. Could not be called “best practice" for ICANN, but is an excellent “good practice” for NOMCOM. My 2cents Vanda Scartezini From: SeB ICANN via Phr <phr@icann.org> Date: Tuesday, 18 February 2025 at 11:28 To: phr@icann.org <phr@icann.org> Subject: [Phr] Re: Update on Monday's Plenary Call & Next Steps Hello all, My inputs The ATRT3 spent (a lot of) time to discuss best practices vs good practices. It could be useful, not to reinvent the wheel, to go back to the work done by ATRT3? It was evaluated in great detail by the Third Accountability and Transparency Review Team (ATRT3). ALAC / At-Large’s view is that there is no need to relitigate; just reacquaint with the material, as needed, hold current discussions, and act accordingly. To summarize if we talk about best practices it will need to be implemented by all the groups. ATR3 uses good practices to allow each group to adapt the practice of one group to its own need. The future holistic reviews will have to review the Continuous Improvement efforts but not the way they are done (that the responsibility of each SO/AC/NomCom and all together in the CIP). SeB Le 29/01/2025 à 18:26, Jessica Puccio via Phr a écrit : Hello Team - We are currently working to coordinate a meeting with the Board’s Organizational Effectiveness Committee (OEC) in response to León’s request. Since it is unlikely that the meeting with the OEC will occur prior to the team’s next scheduled plenary call, the Monday, 03 February PHR call will be canceled. In lieu of the plenary call, we would like to encourage continued discussion on the survey from the last call, via the mailing list, on the issue of defining “good practices”. There was agreement in the survey that “[r]eviewing continuous improvement efforts of SO/AC/NC based on good practices”, is within our remit. With this in mind, we would like to ask: 1. How should best practices be defined? (Pg 22 & 72 of ATRT3 Final Report<https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/atrt3-report-29may20-en.pdf>). 2. Should best practices be understood/agreed upon by the SO/AC/NomCom before each group undertakes its work? We look forward to hearing your thoughts and perspective on this issue. Best Regards Co-Chairs Chris & Sophie -- Jessica Puccio Sr Coordinator, Review Support and Accountability Projects Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN<http://www.icann.org/>) _______________________________________________ Phr mailing list -- phr@icann.org<mailto:phr@icann.org> To unsubscribe send an email to phr-leave@icann.org<mailto:phr-leave@icann.org> -- Sebastien Bachollet Chair of EURALO President d'honneur Isoc France President Espace SocioCulturel du Val du Sauzay (Nievre France) +33 6 07 66 89 33