No objection. Much thanks. -Carlton ============================== *Carlton A Samuels* *Mobile: 876-818-1799Strategy, Process, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* ============================= On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 12:20 PM Lisa Phifer <lisaphifer@gmail.com> wrote:
Team,
On behalf of Alan, below please find our response to Monday's plenary call action item. We were asked to clarify the Rec 2 subgroup's final question and answer in Section 3.3.3, Analysis and Findings -- see page 24 of the 26 August draft. Proposed alternative text appears below:
*4) Finally, the subgroup considered whether the Board’s request <https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2015-04-26-en#1.f> and process framework for a Next-Generation RDS PDP, using the EWG Final Report as input to (and, if appropriate, a foundation for) a new gTLD policy, was effective in producing the single comprehensive RDS (WHOIS) policy envisioned by the WHOIS1 Review Team.*
*It is the RDS-WHOIS2 Review Team's view that, had the plan been executed to completion, a single comprehensive RDS (WHOIS) policy could have emerged. In any event, the ICANN Board-adopted Temporary Specification and the consensus policy expected to result from the Expedited PDP should form the basis for a single RDS (WHOIS) policy. It remains to be seen exactly what additional work, if any, may be need to create a single comprehensive RDS (WHOIS) policy.*
Any objections or amendments to this proposed alternative text should be sent to the RT mailing list ASAP but no later than 29 August 23.59 UTC.
Regards, Lisa _______________________________________________ RDS-WHOIS2-RT mailing list RDS-WHOIS2-RT@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rds-whois2-rt