Clearly what I would refer to as "Dreaming in Technicolor". But it is not clear to me from these documents whose estimates these were. Alan At 08/03/2018 10:07 AM, Erika Mann wrote:
Interesting observations from Mike O'Connor. Looking back to the beginning of the last round of new TLDs and looking at today's data.
"Hereâs the reference that caught my eye:
You can find this on page 150 of the newly-released Whois study done by the Expert Woorking Group on gTLD Directory Services. Hereâs the link to the study <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/filles/final-report-06jun14-en.pdf>https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/final-report-06jun14-en.pdf
The thing that struck me was that whopping 22% annual growth rate. Partly this is due to some pretty optimistic assumptions about the growth in the number of new gTLDs (Iâm willing to bet any money that the beginning of 2015 will not see 200,000 gTLD domains in the root). But leaving that aside, 22% year over year growth isnât something weâve seen since pre-bubble glory days."
Sent from my iPhone Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics:
1;YQXPR0101MB1589;27:JBQUu5rJUZs5L6tRp9d/E3LPRW+6PlDxV8wlomwQGyvH2yELKDTm4ErXgNgTT7Q2q4CM4+3IruQRFfUhbv2C9YJndWyRFdFDjcTcAA4DBnVZ5l/prWA0+eg6wupzh4CF X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info:
McCHNcVQf30gMUCljvD4vvRTaa3hJ6E9nL0MFRsDVF6woROAt15lQxGm6v75s6X5T12tp2IS0ppfzuERW6a3hjRF1e1nm/g1VD9YMkouYvk4NZIi9CRuTVQJKuiZwrgNkM6TY4z29J/glfNr/QtITyhnJ91UKcV172JeYiusyobKfqVRLGYh89f53/RsKsvVlpeJ0clfteLrrVipJRIlRnohDWJxrU4brkASGVmKlJF0CKmg1E3IZx4R7LU2fzhsiH0YL5FdLcQ2Bs8TqBvhCrWoBVXG/jeuSDp9XrIYY+JcMq2+9iUf0tJLETxivy47CoYQCLhel6MvqUxm24iGfI2MBNOqL1sIaSwTbLl9McmQ6OdTLP5Tw5TKvcqaAmdX
_______________________________________________ RDS-WHOIS2-RT mailing list RDS-WHOIS2-RT@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rds-whois2-rt