I support having Co-Chairs. +1 to Alan's suggestion of interim leadership (Chief of Party?) to settle scope and related matters before the permanent leadership is taken. -Carlton ============================== *Carlton A Samuels* *Mobile: 876-818-1799Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* ============================= On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:
Thanks Alice,
I strongly support the having a Chair and one or more vice-chairs, but could also live with Co-Chairs.
However, the workload will be strongly influenced by what we decide as the scope of the RT, and I would suggest the we select interim leadership to run that discussion before deciding on the formal RT leadership.
I am prepared to assume a role in the longer term leadership, and if the RT desires, I am also prepared to act as an Interim Chair to discuss the scope issue.
Alan
At 19/06/2017 12:45 PM, Alice Jansen wrote:
Dear Review Team Members,
Following up on your initial leadership conversations held last Thursday, this is to officially launch the call for expressions of interest in a leadership position on the Review Team. Please indicate your interest using this mailing-list. The Review Team will need to reach a decision on the desired structure for the leadership: Chair/Vice-Chair(s), Chair, CoChairs etc. Attached to this email you will find slides that encapsulate both background information on past Review Teams’ leadership structure as well as a description of leadership roles and responsibilities. We hope you will find this helpful. We invite all Review Team Member to indicate any preference they may have with respect to the leadership structure.
Thank you, Best regards Alice
_______________________________________________ RDS-WHOIS2-RT mailing list RDS-WHOIS2-RT@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rds-whois2-rt