Doubtless true, Alan, but a careful read is required to see if we have justified the recommendations. So one might as well do full comments. I am sure there will be a final edit to catch typos etc but I have caught quite a few unclear constructions, rationales, and a few misstatements that undermine the recommendations. I realize people have different ways of working. I work best with a full document to digest. cheers Stephanie On 2018-08-26 20:58, Alan Greenberg wrote:
Stephanie, the critical issue right now is the recommendations as that is what we need to approve at tomorrow's meeting.
Alan -- Sent from my mobile. Please excuse brevity and typos.
On August 26, 2018 6:37:41 PM EDT, Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin@mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:
Unfortunately I am far from finished going through the entire document with a careful read, you all must be speed readers compared to me. Here is the first batch of comments, I will continue but may I suggest you agree to take comments up to Midnight local time? fairer and since I doubt anyone is logging on at midnight UTC to start reviewing, seems more sensible. May I suggest in future that we work in google drive or some common interface that shows all our comments? This is very inefficient.
Otherwise those of us who are uncomfortable with some sections still will be driven to dissent. That would be most unfortunate.
Stephanie Perrin
On 2018-08-25 00:58, Alan Greenberg wrote:
Next Monday, we will have the plenary meeting to finalize the draft report contents and in particular the recommendations. The meeting is scheduled for 2 hours.
*_The deadline for submitting objections to be discussed during the meeting is 23:59 UTC on Sunday, 26 August 2018.
_*On Monday we will review any objections or alternate language and determine the level of consensus for each recommendation. There are a lot of sections and recommendations to cover so we will have to be brief and specific. We will also establish priority level for the recommendations.
Although we will strive for full (unanimous consensus), it is not required and our ToR gives guidelines for this.
Anyone who is not on the call and has not explicitly identified an issue is deemed to be in agreement with the current text.
*_If any written statement of objection or dissenting opinions are to be included in the published draft report, they must be submitted no later that 23:59 UTC on Wednesday, 29 August 2018.
_*Please be on time (or early!) for the meeting so that we can begin on the hour.
Alan
_______________________________________________ RDS-WHOIS2-RT mailing list RDS-WHOIS2-RT@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rds-whois2-rt
_______________________________________________ RDS-WHOIS2-RT mailing list RDS-WHOIS2-RT@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rds-whois2-rt