Re: [RDS-WHOIS2-RT] ICANN Proposal to adjust scope of RDS-WHOIS2-RT
Carlton and Erika, I'm glad you think that we made the right choice. What happens if the community wisdom is that we have not? Alan At 16/05/2018 05:02 AM, Carlton Samuels wrote:
I read the paper per Interim arrangements. In my view the elements of interest were part of our own scoping discussions. And in terms of our several agreements pertaining, it seems to me we have covered the bases.
We made the right decisions. The rational choice for us is Option A; Proceed as planned.
-Carlton
On Tue, 15 May 2018, 9:42 pm Alan Greenberg, <<mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote: I call your attention to a Public Comment (PC) launched yesterday asking for input on alternatives to alter the RDS-WHOIS2-RT Scope and plans (as well possible changes to the not yet started ATRT3) - <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/specific-reviews-short-term-timeline-2018-05-14-en>https://www.icann.org/public-comments/specific-reviews-short-term-timeline-2018-05-14-en.
I proposes three possible scenarios for our RT:
a) Proceeds as planned;
b) reduce scope to just an analysis of the WHOIS1-RT Recommendations;
c) pause the review entirely for some as yet to be determined time.
If recommended by the community, b) and c) would require our agreement. The implications of a community recommendation that we refused to agree with are not known. If there is a pause, it is not clear when the unpause would happen and to what extent it would be the same team moving forward.
The PC ends on 06 July 2018 and the report on input received is due on 23 July 2018, a few days before we are currently planning to meet in Brussels to close-to-finalize our report.
Although the PC was issues yesterday, neither I nor Susan and Cathrin had any prior knowledge of it and in fact we only heard of it today.
We have initiated discussions with MSSI on exactly what this means and will get back when I have a better understanding.
Alan
_______________________________________________ RDS-WHOIS2-RT mailing list <mailto:RDS-WHOIS2-RT@icann.org>RDS-WHOIS2-RT@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rds-whois2-rt
Alan: As you'd know, I'm not one to go along with what I consider a wrong-headed view. The only response would be for the community to withdraw support for the RT to continue. Then we are retired for cause. So be it. -Carlton ============================== *Carlton A Samuels* *Mobile: 876-818-1799Strategy, Process, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* ============================= On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 9:10 AM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:
Carlton and Erika,
I'm glad you think that we made the right choice. What happens if the community wisdom is that we have not?
Alan
At 16/05/2018 05:02 AM, Carlton Samuels wrote:
I read the paper per Interim arrangements. In my view the elements of interest were part of our own scoping discussions. And in terms of our several agreements pertaining, it seems to me we have covered the bases.
We made the right decisions. The rational choice for us is Option A; Proceed as planned.
-Carlton
On Tue, 15 May 2018, 9:42 pm Alan Greenberg, <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca > wrote: I call your attention to a Public Comment (PC) launched yesterday asking for input on alternatives to alter the RDS-WHOIS2-RT Scope and plans (as well possible changes to the not yet started ATRT3) - https://www.icann.org/public-comments/specific-reviews- short-term-timeline-2018-05-14-en .
I proposes three possible scenarios for our RT:
a) Proceeds as planned;
b) reduce scope to just an analysis of the WHOIS1-RT Recommendations;
c) pause the review entirely for some as yet to be determined time.
If recommended by the community, b) and c) would require our agreement. The implications of a community recommendation that we refused to agree with are not known. If there is a pause, it is not clear when the unpause would happen and to what extent it would be the same team moving forward.
The PC ends on 06 July 2018 and the report on input received is due on 23 July 2018, a few days before we are currently planning to meet in Brussels to close-to-finalize our report.
Although the PC was issues yesterday, neither I nor Susan and Cathrin had any prior knowledge of it and in fact we only heard of it today.
We have initiated discussions with MSSI on exactly what this means and will get back when I have a better understanding.
Alan
_______________________________________________ RDS-WHOIS2-RT mailing list RDS-WHOIS2-RT@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rds-whois2-rt
participants (2)
-
Alan Greenberg -
Carlton Samuels