Dear review team members, Following up on today’s plenary call #40, please find below the action items/decisions reached. We also attached the “recommendations prioritization” chart which was projected in Adobe Connect. Status of report: ADOPTED. On Executive Summary Status: Adopted with one edit: * Replace "privacy mechanisms" by "informal privacy/proxy mechanisms" On WHOIS1 Rec #1 - Strategic Priority Status: Adopted with following edits and recommendation priority * Replace "significant concern" with "significant importance" * Add footnote on policy * Add "ICANN did not take any action to address".to address SP10 and tie to relevant section * Agreement for R1.1 - 1.2 to be high priority * Agreement for R1.3 to be medium priority On WHOIS1 Rec #2 - Single WHOIS Policy Status: Adopted with following edits: * Improve readability (SP13) * Lisa/Alan to draft paragraph to address Stephanie's comment SP14 * Sentence "We would expect the affirmed Temporary Specification will exist as a digital artefact and will be the new base for a single documented source of all things pertaining gTLD Registration Data (WHOIS)." will be removed, to address comment SP16. * To address SP17: add footnote noting that there was one objection the Board did not notice in its acceptance. Use Accept instead of adopt. * To address SP18: hopefully instead of likely On WHOIS Rec #3 – Outreach Status: Adopted with following edits: * To address SP19, ICANN org to strike all from introductory sentence in all subgroups' sections * To address SP20, strike phrase pertaining to educate them * The first sentence should end "gTLD domains. The content should be revised..." * Agreement for R3.1 (including two suggested edits) with medium priority * Include after first sentence of the rationale for 3.2: this need was further supported by parts of the ICANN community * Agreement for R3.2 to be high priority On WHOIS1 Rec #4 – Compliance Status: Adopted with following edits: * Insert "contract negotiation or" after "in which case" in Feasibility * Agreement for R4.1 and R4.2 to be high priority On WHOIS Recs# 5-9 - Data Accuracy Status: Adopted with following edit: * Agreement to leave Priority as "To be determined" * Agreement on rec.5.1 On WHOIS 1 Rec#10 - Privacy/Proxy Services Status: Adopted with following edits: * Adjust text to use 31 December 2019 and remove "implementation timeframes notwithstanding" * Agreement for 10.1 and 10.2 to be low priority On WHOIS1 Rec#11 - Common Interface Status: Adopted with following edits: * Agreement for 11.1 to be low priority * Agreement for R11.2 to be high priority On WHOIS1 Recs#12-14 – IDNs Status: Adopted * Agreement for R12.1 to be low priority On WHOIS Recs #15-16 Status: Adopted * Agreement for R15.1 to be medium priority On Subgroup 2 Anything New Status: Adopted On Subgroup 3 Law Enforcement Needs Status: Adopted * Agreement on Rec.LE.1 & LE.2 with high priority * leave recommendation LE.2 as is, adding "on a regular basis" at the end * No objections On Subgroup 4 Consumer Trust Status: Adopted as is with no recommendations On Subgroup 5: Safeguarding Registrant Data Status: Adopted * Agreement on SG.1 with Medium Priority On Subgroup 6: ICANN Contractual Compliance Status: Adopted * CM.1 is accepted as is with priority "High" * CM.2: delete comment and accept as written, with Medium Priority * CM.3: agreed with priority set as "Low" * CM.4: Agreement for recommendation with "Low" priority. Add a footnote * CM5: Accepted. Low priority On ICANN Bylaws: Status: Adopted * Rec.BY.1: Adopted with Medium priority. Next steps Action Item: ICANN org to complete all of the edits listed above. * For any items the review team needs to discuss, review team members to send email with label REPORT URGENT. * If further discussion is needed on a unforeseen item, meeting will be held on Tuesday. Kind regards, Jean-Baptiste Deroulez