Questions for each subgroup
Several questions were asked of each SubGroup Rapporteur, due before the 09 Feb Plenary (this Friday). Here are the answers for my SubGroups. Alan ================ WHOIS Rec #3: Outreach
Has your subgroup identified any needed briefings/resources?
No.
How will your subgroup review/analyze relevant documentation? (for example, will you divide review between subgroup members)
Each member will review all of the documents (largely web-based) and will independently review for consistency and completeness. The Subgroup will then meet to integrate findings.
How will you conduct investigation of identified objectives?(for example, will you need calls or conduct work via email)
We will need one or more calls once independent work is done.
How will you conduct relevant interviews (as appropriate)?
Not needed at this point.
How will your subgroup produce its summary of key findings?
As above, will meet (teleconference) to attempt to unify findings. Based on those, we will decide whether any additional recommendations are required. Results of analysis and possible further recommendations will be compiled by one subgroup member and reviewed by the others prior to the April meeting in Brussels. ================ Safeguard Registrant Data
Has your subgroup identified any needed briefings/resources?
No.
How will your subgroup review/analyze relevant documentation? (for example, will you divide review between subgroup members)
Rapporteur will draft a strawman response to be reviewed and modified by team members.
How will you conduct investigation of identified objectives?(for example, will you need calls or conduct work via email)
This is a relatively easy task prior to GDPR. Post-initiial GDPR, we can predict that the answers will be different, but it is less clear if the response will be measurably more complex. Both e-mail and teleconferences will be used.
How will you conduct relevant interviews (as appropriate)?
Not needed at this point.
How will your subgroup produce its summary of key findings?
Noted above.
Dear all, Please refer to below the draft answers from my subgroups: ================ WHOIS Rec #5-9: Data Accuracy 1. Has your subgroup identified any needed briefings/resources? Besides the written detailed implementation reports for the Recommendations of the first WHOIS-RT from ICANN Org, no further briefing is needed at this point. 2. How will your subgroup review/analyze relevant documentation? (for example, will you divide review between subgroup members) Based on the first-pass planning document, subgroup members are encouraged to pick up at least one of the questions, which will be needed to answer in assessing whether the objective has been reached, and then conduct the review for this specific question. This Subgroup will integrate findings by the end of March. 3. How will you conduct investigation of identified objectives?(for example, will you need calls or conduct work via email) I'd suggest to conduct work via email. Upon subgroup member's request, ad-hoc call could be arranged if needed. 4. How will you conduct relevant interviews (as appropriate)? Questionnaires will be prepared separately for ICANN's contractual compliance team and WHOIS Accuracy Reporting System (ARS) project team by the end of Feb to facilitate the interview. 5. How will your subgroup produce its summary of key findings? The rapporteur is supposed to collect the key findings from each subgroup member by the end of March, and then integrate them into a single document. The summary would be extract from the key findings and reviewed by subgroup members prior to the April meeting in Brussels. ================ WHOIS Rec #15-16: Plan & Annual Reports 1. Has your subgroup identified any needed briefings/resources? 1) The written detailed implementation reports for the Recommendations of the first WHOIS-RT from ICANN Org 2) The summary of the key findings of other subgroups on Topic 1 (Rec #1, Rec #2, Rec #3, Rec #4, Rec #5-9, Rec #10, Rec #11, Rec #12-14). 2. How will your subgroup review/analyze relevant documentation? (for example, will you divide review between subgroup members) All subgroup members are expected to review all of the relating documents (see wiki page) for assessment. This Subgroup will integrate findings once key findings of other subgroups on Topic 1 are ready. 3. How will you conduct investigation of identified objectives?(for example, will you need calls or conduct work via email) Coordinating the views of subgroup members via email would be enough. 4. How will you conduct relevant interviews (as appropriate)? Not needed at this point. 5. How will your subgroup produce its summary of key findings? The rapporteur is supposed to collect the key findings from other subgroups, and then consolidate them into the summary. Ideally, the summary could be prepared prior to the April meeting in Brussels. Regards, Lili *************************************************************************************************** This message, and any attachment contained, are confidential and subject of legal privilege. It may be used solely for the designated police/justice purpose and by the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. The information is not to be disseminated to another agency or third party without the author’s consent, and must not be retained longer than is necessary for the fulfilment of the purpose for which the information is to be used. All practicable steps shall be taken by the recipients to ensure that information is protected against unauthorised access or processing. INTERPOL reserves the right to enquire about the use of the information provided. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this message in error. In such a case, you should not print it, copy it, make any use of it or disclose it, but please notify us immediately and delete the message from any computer. *************************************************************************************************
Hello, Here are the answers from the IDN subgroup ============ *WHOIS Rec #12-14: IDNHas your subgroup identified any needed briefings/resources?We need the intermediate results on Implementation Status of Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information (according to briefing, the effective date is February 2018).How will your subgroup review/analyze relevant documentation? (for example, will you divide review between subgroup members)Each member will review all of the documents (largely web-based) and will independently review for matching the recommendations #12-14. The Subgroup will then integrate results (mostly in email-based form) to provide an intermediate report.How will you conduct investigation of identified objectives?(for example, will you need calls or conduct work via email)We will need one or more calls once independent work is done.How will you conduct relevant interviews (as appropriate)?Not needed at this point.How will your subgroup produce its summary of key findings?After providing an intermediate report, we will either discuss it via email or have a teleconference to unify our results. Based on those, we will decide whether any additional recommendations are required. Results of analysis and possible further recommendations will be compiled by one subgroup member and reviewed by the others prior to the April meeting in Brussels.*============== On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 7:53 AM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:
Several questions were asked of each SubGroup Rapporteur, due before the 09 Feb Plenary (this Friday).
Here are the answers for my SubGroups.
Alan
================ WHOIS Rec #3: Outreach
Has your subgroup identified any needed briefings/resources?
*No. *
How will your subgroup review/analyze relevant documentation? (for example, will you divide review between subgroup members)
*Each member will review all of the documents (largely web-based) and will independently review for consistency and completeness. The Subgroup will then meet to integrate findings. *
How will you conduct investigation of identified objectives?(for example, will you need calls or conduct work via email)
*We will need one or more calls once independent work is done. *
How will you conduct relevant interviews (as appropriate)?
*Not needed at this point*.
How will your subgroup produce its summary of key findings?
*As above, will meet (teleconference) to attempt to unify findings. Based on those, we will decide whether any additional recommendations are required. Results of analysis and possible further recommendations will be compiled by one subgroup member and reviewed by the others prior to the April meeting in Brussels. *================ Safeguard Registrant Data
Has your subgroup identified any needed briefings/resources?
*No. *
How will your subgroup review/analyze relevant documentation? (for example, will you divide review between subgroup members)
*Rapporteur will draft a strawman response to be reviewed and modified by team members. *
How will you conduct investigation of identified objectives?(for example, will you need calls or conduct work via email)
*This is a relatively easy task prior to GDPR. Post-initiial GDPR, we can predict that the answers will be different, but it is less clear if the response will be measurably more complex. Both e-mail and teleconferences will be used. *
How will you conduct relevant interviews (as appropriate)?
*Not needed at this point*.
How will your subgroup produce its summary of key findings?
*Noted above. *
_______________________________________________ RDS-WHOIS2-RT mailing list RDS-WHOIS2-RT@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rds-whois2-rt
-- SY, Dmitry Belyavsky
Apologies that I can't be with you!
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 7:53 AM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote: Several questions were asked of each SubGroup Rapporteur, due before the 09 Feb Plenary (this Friday).
Here are the answers for my SubGroups.
Alan
================ WHOIS Rec #3: Outreach
Has your subgroup identified any needed briefings/resources?
As identified in the first response, input from staff is needed with regard to review certain already identified questions ...
How will your subgroup review/analyze relevant documentation? (for example, will you divide review between subgroup members)
Members will have to review documents individually, then all together will discuss and review findings
How will you conduct investigation of identified objectives?(for example, will you need calls or conduct work via email)
We need one call(s), emails
How will you conduct relevant interviews (as appropriate)?
Interviews with staff can be arranged by phone
How will your subgroup produce its summary of key findings?
Teleconferences. If needed, we will decide whether additional methods/recommendations are required.
Has your subgroup identified any needed briefings/resources?
See our first response, few questions need to be answered by staff.
How will your subgroup review/analyze relevant documentation? (for example, will you divide review between subgroup members)
Rapporteur will do a draft response - team will modify and review
How will you conduct investigation of identified objectives?(for example, will you need calls or conduct work via email)
Work largely via email/Google doc, maybe a single call is going to be needed
How will you conduct relevant interviews (as
Few interviews with staff (calls)
How will your subgroup produce its summary of key findings?
Mentioned above
_______________________________________________ RDS-WHOIS2-RT mailing list RDS-WHOIS2-RT@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rds-whois2-rt
-
I am sorry, I caught a bad flu in LA which has now moved on to bronchitis. Out of commission for a short while. Stephanie On 2018-02-07 23:53, Alan Greenberg wrote:
Several questions were asked of each SubGroup Rapporteur, due before the 09 Feb Plenary (this Friday).
Here are the answers for my SubGroups.
Alan
================ WHOIS Rec #3: Outreach
Has your subgroup identified any needed briefings/resources?
*No.
*
How will your subgroup review/analyze relevant documentation? (for example, will you divide review between subgroup members)
*Each member will review all of the documents (largely web-based) and will independently review for consistency and completeness. The Subgroup will then meet to integrate findings.
*
How will you conduct investigation of identified objectives?(for example, will you need calls or conduct work via email)
*We will need one or more calls once independent work is done.
*
How will you conduct relevant interviews (as appropriate)?
*Not needed at this point*.
How will your subgroup produce its summary of key findings?
*As above, will meet (teleconference) to attempt to unify findings. Based on those, we will decide whether any additional recommendations are required. Results of analysis and possible further recommendations will be compiled by one subgroup member and reviewed by the others prior to the April meeting in Brussels.
*================ Safeguard Registrant Data
Has your subgroup identified any needed briefings/resources?
*No.
*
How will your subgroup review/analyze relevant documentation? (for example, will you divide review between subgroup members)
*Rapporteur will draft a strawman response to be reviewed and modified by team members.
*
How will you conduct investigation of identified objectives?(for example, will you need calls or conduct work via email)
*This is a relatively easy task prior to GDPR. Post-initiial GDPR, we can predict that the answers will be different, but it is less clear if the response will be measurably more complex. Both e-mail and teleconferences will be used.
*
How will you conduct relevant interviews (as appropriate)?
*Not needed at this point*.
How will your subgroup produce its summary of key findings?
*Noted above. *
_______________________________________________ RDS-WHOIS2-RT mailing list RDS-WHOIS2-RT@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rds-whois2-rt
participants (5)
-
Alan Greenberg -
Dmitry Belyavsky -
Erika Mann -
Stephanie Perrin -
SUN Lili