May 2019 - RegDataPolicy.PreIRT

EPDP Phase 1 Board Resolution published; RegDataPolicy:Interim Policy publication to follow
by Dennis Chang May 18, 2019

May 18, 2019

Dear pre-IRT, The Board resolution for the EPDP Phase 1 has now been published: https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2019-05-15-en Based on the Board resolution, I made a change to avoid potential confusion since Board did not adopt parts of some of the recommendations. A simple change in the last sentence in first paragraph: from “complete set of EPDP recommendations” to “Board-approved recommendations” in the last sentence first paragraph. The link to the Board resolution was also added. I left comments on the document to make it easy for you to spot the changes. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oBGjh86oxCt5XHV0uxBXg1P6smomKjBC2Fe5yb7… We will continue with our plan for publication of the Interim Policy. Thank you all for your excellent support for being prepared early. — Kind Regards, Dennis S. Chang GDD Services & Engagement Program Director Telephone: +1 213 293 7889 Skype: dennisSchang www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org>

2 1

Interim Registration Data Policy published
by Dennis Chang May 17, 2019

May 17, 2019

Dear pre-IRT, Thank you and congratulations! The Interim Registration Data Policy for gTLDs has been published. https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/interim-registration-data-policy-en The Consensus Policies page has been updated to add this new policy as well. https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/registrars/consensus-policies-en With this milestone accomplished,we will begin our transition from the pre-IRT to IRT. Please look for an announcement for the ”Call for IRT” next. — Kind Regards, Dennis S. Chang GDD Services & Engagement Program Director Telephone: +1 213 293 7889 Skype: dennisSchang www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org>

1 0

Re: [RegDataPolicy.PreIRT] draft Interim RegDataPolicy
by James M. Bladel May 6, 2019

May 6, 2019

Hello Dennis and PreIRT Team – I made two comments to the Google doc: First, I think we should be clear on when each Stage begins and ends, and that (especially for Stage 2) the pace of transitioning from Temp Spec to the RDS policy is at the discretion of the Contracted Party. Secondly, I believe we should explicitly state that Stage 3 means that the new RDS policy becomes operative, and the Interim Policy is no longer in force. I know that this is implied in the language, but this should be as clear as possible to avoid any confusion. Thanks- J. ------------- James Bladel GoDaddy From: "RegDataPolicy.PreIRT" <regdatapolicy.preirt-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Dennis Chang <dennis.chang(a)icann.org> Date: Monday, April 29, 2019 at 13:27 To: "regdatapolicy.preirt(a)icann.org" <regdatapolicy.preirt(a)icann.org> Subject: [RegDataPolicy.PreIRT] draft Interim RegDataPolicy Dear Pre-IRT, IPT has drafted the Interim Registration Data Policy for gTLDs, which is expected to go into effect when the Temporary Specification expires on 20 May 2019 here in the pre-IRT team drive: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oBGjh86oxCt5XHV0uxBXg1P6smomKjBC2Fe5yb7…<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oBGjh86oxCt5XHV0uxBXg1P6smomKjBC2Fe5yb7…> The draft Interim Policy incorporates many of the suggestions from the pre-IRT and, previously, by the EPDP Team in Kobe. The draft Interim Policy is, essentially, a timeline that points to applicable requirements in other documents rather than a description of substantive requirements. This is drafted as a Policy, rather than a notice or advisory, to ensure that the applicable requirements are clearly identified in a formal document that is binding on contracted parties pursuant to their relevant agreements with ICANN org. We did not incorporate the language that was suggested that “Failure to respond within 30 days of this notice shall be considered acceptance of the terms herein will be considered acceptance,” for a variety of reasons, including that contracted parties are required to follow this recommended carryover of the Temp Spec as a matter of Policy-there is not an option to reject the requirements. We believe this is a straightforward implementation of Recommendation 28 and aligned with the recommendation. Please let us know if you note any inconsistency with the recommendation in the EPDP Phase 1 final report. — Kind Regards, Dennis S. Chang GDD Services & Engagement Program Director Telephone: +1 213 293 7889 Skype: dennisSchang www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org>

4 3

Re: [RegDataPolicy.PreIRT] [Ext] Re: draft Interim RegDataPolicy
by Dennis Chang May 6, 2019

May 6, 2019

Thanks pre-IRT for your comments and feedback. It’s indeed good to see that the IPT captured what the EPDP Team had wanted to accomplish with the Recommendation #28. I agree that we are well aligned. Please note that we’ve responded to the comments with a few suggested changed based on your comments on clarity. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oBGjh86oxCt5XHV0uxBXg1P6smomKjBC2Fe5yb7…<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oBGjh86oxCt5XHV0uxBXg1P6smomKjBC2Fe5yb7…> Also, attached is an updated chart for our stages of policy. Beth gets her Rainbow Bridge! But you must cross the Blue Bridge to get to the Rainbow Bridge. Thanks Dennis Chang From: Matt Serlin <matt(a)brandsight.com> Date: Saturday, May 4, 2019 at 2:27 AM To: theo <gtheo(a)xs4all.nl>, "James M. Bladel" <jbladel(a)godaddy.com>, Dennis Chang <dennis.chang(a)icann.org>, "regdatapolicy.preirt(a)icann.org" <regdatapolicy.preirt(a)icann.org> Subject: [Ext] Re: [RegDataPolicy.PreIRT] draft Interim RegDataPolicy Want to just agree with the comments James put into the Google doc…think it will add some clarity to the text overall and avoid any confusion in the future. Other than those small comments, I did want to commend Dennis and team for pretty much capturing exactly what it was we wanted to accomplish with this recommendation so think we are well positioned once the temp spec expires this month. Have a good weekend all and safe travels to those headed to GDD next week. Regards, Matt From: "RegDataPolicy.PreIRT" <regdatapolicy.preirt-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of theo <gtheo(a)xs4all.nl> Date: Friday, May 3, 2019 at 1:03 PM To: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel(a)godaddy.com>, Dennis Chang <dennis.chang(a)icann.org>, "regdatapolicy.preirt(a)icann.org" <regdatapolicy.preirt(a)icann.org> Subject: Re: [RegDataPolicy.PreIRT] draft Interim RegDataPolicy Agreed, confusion at this point would be bad. Theo Op 03-05-19 om 19:33 schreef James M. Bladel: Hello Dennis and PreIRT Team – I made two comments to the Google doc: First, I think we should be clear on when each Stage begins and ends, and that (especially for Stage 2) the pace of transitioning from Temp Spec to the RDS policy is at the discretion of the Contracted Party. Secondly, I believe we should explicitly state that Stage 3 means that the new RDS policy becomes operative, and the Interim Policy is no longer in force. I know that this is implied in the language, but this should be as clear as possible to avoid any confusion. Thanks- J. ------------- James Bladel GoDaddy From: "RegDataPolicy.PreIRT" <regdatapolicy.preirt-bounces(a)icann.org><mailto:regdatapolicy.preirt-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Dennis Chang <dennis.chang(a)icann.org><mailto:dennis.chang@icann.org> Date: Monday, April 29, 2019 at 13:27 To: "regdatapolicy.preirt(a)icann.org"<mailto:regdatapolicy.preirt@icann.org> <regdatapolicy.preirt(a)icann.org><mailto:regdatapolicy.preirt@icann.org> Subject: [RegDataPolicy.PreIRT] draft Interim RegDataPolicy Dear Pre-IRT, IPT has drafted the Interim Registration Data Policy for gTLDs, which is expected to go into effect when the Temporary Specification expires on 20 May 2019 here in the pre-IRT team drive: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oBGjh86oxCt5XHV0uxBXg1P6smomKjBC2Fe5yb7… [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_docume…> The draft Interim Policy incorporates many of the suggestions from the pre-IRT and, previously, by the EPDP Team in Kobe. The draft Interim Policy is, essentially, a timeline that points to applicable requirements in other documents rather than a description of substantive requirements. This is drafted as a Policy, rather than a notice or advisory, to ensure that the applicable requirements are clearly identified in a formal document that is binding on contracted parties pursuant to their relevant agreements with ICANN org. We did not incorporate the language that was suggested that “Failure to respond within 30 days of this notice shall be considered acceptance of the terms herein will be considered acceptance,” for a variety of reasons, including that contracted parties are required to follow this recommended carryover of the Temp Spec as a matter of Policy-there is not an option to reject the requirements. We believe this is a straightforward implementation of Recommendation 28 and aligned with the recommendation. Please let us know if you note any inconsistency with the recommendation in the EPDP Phase 1 final report. — Kind Regards, Dennis S. Chang GDD Services & Engagement Program Director Telephone: +1 213 293 7889 Skype: dennisSchang www.icann.org [icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.icann.org&d=DwMGaQ&…> _______________________________________________ RegDataPolicy.PreIRT mailing list RegDataPolicy.PreIRT(a)icann.org<mailto:RegDataPolicy.PreIRT@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/regdatapolicy.preirt

1 0