Aug. 9, 2004
12:58 p.m.
Morning, or afternoon, again Bruce,
Agreed.
Now I'm confused. I thought you wrote that the PIR <info> mods were defensible, citing the .au registry practice, and that this is a whois issue. I had the impression that I wrote that PIR <info> mods were not defensible (to really be anal about this, PIR should put out an extension to EPP that defines any non-zero response to be generally an error, except where authinfo is presented by the registrar, which several of us could write for them), and that this isn't a whois issue. Maybe we're just in agreement that when PIR spills its soup, tails wag. Eric