Just so there's no misunderstandings, please see the original motion that resulted in this ballot. Given the way the ballot is presented, and the motion it represents, a vote of NO on this ballot is in effect a vote FOR option 1 below. Tim -----Original Message----- From: owner-registrars@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-registrars@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 6:59 PM To: 'Registrars Constituency' Subject: RE: [registrars] Motion to amend voting procedures.
MOTION: I hereby move that we have a runoff election between the two proposals with the highest percentage of the prior vote, specifically:
1. Post individual voting results, but only at the conclusion of the voting period. 2. Continue to post individual voting results, during the entire voting period.
end quote:
I endorse this motion. Tim Ruiz