Nov. 9, 2007
11:34 p.m.
At 02:32 PM 11/9/2007 Friday -0800, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
This puts a (process) conclusion ahead of any (policy) ballot. I suggest not making (process) comments, after all, in theory we could reach a two-thirds position among the voting RC members.
Dear Eric: Precisely why I am making a second motion. Our negotiator must have the consensus of the Consistory in order to be credible. I trust you'll endorse Tim's motion --- *and* mine:-) Regards, BobC