John: I think the repeated use of "I" (8X) in my original email should be rather self evident that I was expressing my personal views. Although it is true that I do occasional consulting work with a number of ICANN accredited registrars, these were just my personal comments about a provision in the registrar charter that is beyond ambiguous. In fact one might even submit its definition is subject to unilateral change/interpretation much along the same lines that some registrars change their registrant agreements to fit their particular business models. Although I had previously thought about responding to Rob Hall's post from a couple of months ago regarding the origins of the "Registry Sensitive or Proprietary Information", I was just too busy as of late. However, it seemed that I had some free time last evening while I was waiting for some legal correspondence in connection with another client matter. Hopefully these emails to you and Paul have resolved any miscommunication/misperceptions. Best regards, Michael -----Original Message----- From: owner-registrars@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-registrars@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of John Berryhill Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 4:06 AM To: 'Michael D. Palage'; 'Paul Stahura'; 'Registrars Constituency' Subject: RE: [registrars] Registry Sensitive or Proprietary Information
From: Michael D. Palage [mailto:Michael@palage.com] While I support your candidacy to the Non-Com,
Mike, could you clarify the registrar on behalf of which your "support" is posted to the RC list?