Ok, let me rephrase... If the Registrant and Admin are fraudulently changed, and then a Transfer is processed, then according to the TDP and the Gaining Registrar, the transfer is fine. If however, the Losing Registrar agrees that the listed Registrant was not actually the Registrant due to an internal error or fraudulent change, then yes, I can see that the TDP would apply. Any real world experiences where the Losing Registrar admits to a fraud happening on their end when the Gaining Registrar is fighting the TDP (claiming that all process was followed)? Thx Richard -----Original Message----- From: Ross Rader [mailto:ross@tucows.com] Sent: 07 August, 2007 2:55 PM To: Lau Cc: 'Paul Lecoultre (CORE secretariat)'; 'Registrars Constituency' Subject: Re: [registrars] Grave Robbing and SEDO Fencing Lau wrote:
Am I wrong? (Please, someone, tell me that I am).
The subtlety that tends to get missed is that the transfer policy hinges on whether or not the registrant, or the admin at the behest of the registrant, approved the transfer of registrar. I am not sure why this has been interpreted as "if the admin approved it, it must be good", but this has been the case since the policy was implemented. If the registrant hasn't agreed to it, even if the admin has, it is technically a bad transfer. -- Regards, Ross Rader Director, Retail Services Tucows Inc. http://www.domaindirect.com t. 416.538.5492