In the mean time, we need to abide by the current vote. The current ballot is not within our rules, and therefore, the results of any such election would be invalid. Frankly, I am a little annoyed that we just finished modifying the ballot, and still did not get it right. Rob. -----Original Message----- From: owner-registrars@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-registrars@gnso.icann.org]On Behalf Of Siegfried Langenbach Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 10:55 AM To: Registrars Constituency; Bob Connelly Subject: Re: [registrars] Motion to amend voting procedures. Siegfried Langenbach second that motion. On 22 Sep 2004 at 7:23, Bob Connelly wrote: Date sent: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 07:23:51 -0700 To: Registrars Constituency <registrars@dnso.org> From: Bob Connelly <rconnell@psi-japan.com> Subject: [registrars] Motion to amend voting procedures. [...]
MOTION: I hereby move that we have a runoff election between the two proposals
with
the highest percentage of the prior vote, specifically:
1. Post individual voting results, but only at the conclusion of the voting period. 2. Continue to post individual voting results, during the entire voting period.
end quote: