Feb. 27, 2018
12:24 a.m.
On Feb 26, 2018, at 4:16 PM, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
Looks good to me. I still think that we should s/of TSIG resource records/of TSIG/ -- TSIG uses RRs, but they are hidden, and I'm concerned someone will go digging for them -- but, I don't really care.
yeah, removing "resource records" there is fine with me too. DW