On Sep 13, 2019, at 7:58 AM, Shinta Sato <shinta@jprs.co.jp> wrote:
The rationale for each measurement has been discussed in the WP, but I don't beleive that the importance or relation between each metric was discussed in the context.
This is correct. In some of the informal conversations, some people have given some rationale for individual metrics, but the WP has not yet discussed pulling the rationale together or coming to consensus on the rationale. That's why I did my own brain dump, to see if it matches other people's thoughts.
If we need to take such importance into consideration in finding out the threshold, shouldn't we need additional discussion on this prior to expressing the suggestion of the threshold to the spreadsheet?
Maybe the discussion can happen at the same time. The WP leaders want to have some ideas of what people want in the spreadsheet in order to start good discussion on the next call, but those ideas don't need to be at all final.
In addition, the importance has only suggested for the RSO metrics. The importance for RSS metrics would need another discussion as well.
So far, I am unable to come up with any technical or procedural justification for RSS thresholds. It is useful to collect the metrics, but I have tried to come up with some threshold ideas and just failed.
If these are already discussed before, I'd like to see the minutes, transcripts or whatever, as I did miss some meetings.
The rationale ideas I posted are new. I'm hoping others will do similar postings, or at least poke holes in the one I did. --Paul Hoffman